Laserfiche WebLink
<br />alternative exists to resolve the issue; that the variance request is not based solely <br />on economic reasons; and, that the need for the variance was not created by the <br />applicant; and, <br /> <br />2. Based on the State Statue and City policy described, and the fact that the site can <br />be put to a reasonable use under the terms of the existing City Code, there appears <br />to be no justification for a variance. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, that <br />the request for a variance to allow the construction and the placement of an additional <br />monument ground sign on property located at 910 W. County Road D, being the property of The <br />Lutheran Church of the Resurrection, is hereby denied, based on the findings and conclusions as <br />indicated above and in the staff report dated February 10, 1999, and, upon the recommendation <br />of the Planning Commission dated February 10,1999. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member Wall and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Wiski, <br />Maschka, Wall <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: Mastel <br /> <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA) <br />) SS <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) <br /> <br />I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the City of Roseville, County of <br />Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and <br />foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 22nd day of <br />February, 1999, with the original thereof on file in my office. <br /> <br />WITNESS MY HAND officially as such Manager this 22nd day of February, 1999. <br /> <br /> <br />(SEAL) <br /> <br />Subscribed and sw~ me on <br />This IO~ day of ~~ 19~iYJ <br /> <br />~f\~~ <br /> <br />Notary Pubh <br />