Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, March 25,2013 <br /> Page 31 <br /> Councilmember Willmus concurred with Mayor Roe's comments; opining that it <br /> would be very beneficial to see and hear what each Department has for their own <br /> area. Councilmember Willmus opined that it was difficult for him, as an example, <br /> to rely on Mr. Brokke's ranking for activities in the water department being done <br /> by Mr. Schwartz. <br /> In referencing the columns included for 2012, Councilmember Willmus opined <br /> that it would be helpful to him to also be able to look back to 2011, providing two <br /> (2) years for comparison moving forward. Councilmember Willmus noted that <br /> this request was similar to that of former Councilmember Pust in the recent past. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that each program was included in the 2013 budget documenta- <br /> tion in the meeting materials, with information available at least back to 2008. <br /> Councilmember Etten noted the difficulty he found in referencing multiple docu- <br /> ments rather than having the information available on one document. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that it essentially came down to type font and paper size; and <br /> suggested to staff that 2011 —2013 may be possible on one sheet. <br /> Councilmember Willmus further referenced a comment of former Councilmember <br /> Johnson,that budget discussions begin closer to the beginning of a meeting, rather <br /> than at the end and so late in the evening. <br /> Councilmember McGehee spoke in support or larger paper for comparison years, <br /> with one set of pages for each department. <br /> Mayor Roe concurred that it would be helpful that it would be helpful to have the <br /> comparison years per department, and including definitions on that same sheet for <br /> each department. Mayor Roe further suggested that the strategic plans summary <br /> documents for each department could be included in that same document, at least <br /> for the 2014/2015 timeframe. Mayor Roe suggested, to the greatest extent possi- <br /> ble, to have all information for each department contained in one document that <br /> would continue to evolve through the process; and stressed the importance of <br /> identifying them as "revision a, b, or c" and clearly dated on each revision or doc- <br /> ument. Mayor Roe opined that this would not only be helpful to the City Council <br /> but the public as well. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte also spoke in support of getting everything into one <br /> document as suggested by Councilmember Etten; and supported ranking from <br /> high to low based on how critical an item was. Councilmember Laliberte further <br /> supported the initial prioritization from departments versus aggregate. <br /> Councilmember Etten concurred. <br />