My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0422
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0422
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2013 12:43:18 PM
Creation date
5/20/2013 12:43:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/22/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,April 22, 2013 <br /> Page 8 <br /> Mr. Leaf reviewed the remaining process, with tonight's City Council review and <br /> consideration of the plan update, and anticipated presentation for their adoption at <br /> the May 13, 2013 meeting. After that, Mr. Leaf reviewed the implementation <br /> process for applying the plan to private development and public projects (e.g. <br /> Complete Streets); and addressing ongoing problem areas (flooding, impaired wa- <br /> ters; exploring potential funding sources). Mr. Leaf referenced his experience in <br /> working with the Ramsey-Washington-Metro Watershed District, opining that <br /> their funding program for local best management projects was very helpful to <br /> member cities and stand-alone projects, as well as accessing Clean Water Legacy <br /> Act funding. <br /> While she was not at tonight's meeting, Mr. Leaf recognized the work done on the <br /> plan by his associate, Rebecca Nestingen, PE, a Water Resources Engineer with <br /> S. E. H. <br /> Councilmember McGehee requested ideas from Mr. Leaf for recharging ground- <br /> water for individuals and/or the City other than rain gardens, due to the clay soils <br /> in the Roseville area. <br /> Mr. Leaf noted that recharging was dependent on soil types; however, he noted <br /> that infiltration was possible even with clay soils for small storms and were good <br /> to do even when presented with soil limitations. <br /> Ms. Bloom advised that with the City's clay soils, infiltration options were con- <br /> structed (e.g. Aladdin Street at Roselawn Avenue), with four feet 94') of mixed <br /> sand/compost soils substituted for clay allowing drainage within 24 hours even in <br /> those heavier type soils. Ms. Bloom noted that rain gardens were engineered to <br /> provide a reservoir of materials above the clay; and that native plant were also <br /> critical to create a conduit through the clay soils. <br /> Mr. Leaf provided another example, tree boxes, where a course gravel base was <br /> installed to allow tree roots to grow (e.g. Maplewood Mall landscape islands). <br /> Councilmember McGehee requested additional information on rain gardens and <br /> possible buffers, using her personal property as an example. <br /> Mr. Leaf concurred with Councilmember McGehee's option of a buffer planted to <br /> catch water in areas of the most noticeable runoff; and suggested using deeper <br /> rooted plants, as well as rain barrels or cisterns for re-use of that rain water for <br /> day-to-day garden use. <br /> Ms. Bloom referenced the rain water collection and re-use system at Twin Lakes, <br /> with a 20,000 gallon re-use chamber and 20,000 gallon infiltration chamber locat- <br /> ed under the roadway. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.