CC_Minutes_2013_0513 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, May 13, 2013 Page 11 Councilmember Willmus expressed his concern that what Councilmember McGehee was advocating and what guidance the Commission was seeking were comparable. In his observation of the statutory authority of the Commission compared to other citizen advisory commissions to the City Council, Coun- cilmember Willmus opined that their main focus needed to remain hearing land use issues. Councilmember Willmus thanked Commissioners for their current proactive stance in personally visiting sites for land use issues coming before them, and for using that outreach opportunity with applicants, property owners, and the broader community. Councilmember Willmus opined that he saw an ex- panded role for the Commission when the community was going through a vision- ing process, or when the Comprehensive Plan was being updated; but remained uncertain of what additional role was being suggested to the Commission based on this discussion. Councilmember Willmus noted that amount of time volunteer Commissioners were currently committing to for their research, analysis, site vis- its, and meeting time, and expressed his concern in overloading the body further. Councilmember Willmus opined that he was lost in the direction being suggested by Councilmember McGehee, and questioned whether the Commission did also not fully understand that direction as well. Mayor Roe concurred with Councilmember McGehee's suggestion, citing the re- cent asphalt plant application as an example, noting the initial discomfort of some of the Planning Commissioners in recommending approval of the application, and their observation at that time that there may be a broader issue to address in per- mitted uses. As a first line of defense, and if the Commission was uncomfortable with a particular application, Mayor Roe suggested it may serve as an indication that further or more detailed review was needed, or code changes recommended, or a larger notification area considered as a recommended policy question for the City Council. However, Mayor Roe noted that obviously, considering a change in the notification distance was not appropriate in the midst of considering a specific use application, but anytime the Commission observed a current procedure that needed attention, it could initiate such a recommendation to the City Council for their review and taking a closer look. From his perspective, Mayor Roe suggested that, if the Commission felt there was a problem in the process itself, or if they were uncomfortable with their specific role, that they should bring it to the City Council's attention. Councilmember McGehee opined that, over the whole asphalt plant process, the lesson learned was that, from a legal standpoint, the City Code needed to specifi- cally and clearly exclude an undesirable use, putting further burden on the Com- mission and City Council. If the Commission became aware of similar situations, Councilmember McGehee opined that they should make it known to the City Council.