2013_0520_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment A EMM1,2013 XTRACT OF THE INUTES OF THE AY RPC OSEVILLE LANNING OMMISSION a.PROJECT FILE 0017 Request by Roseville Planning Division to modify Section 1011.07 Height Exemption in all Districts, to include industrial silos and other text changes (PROJ-0017) Chair Gisselquist opened the Public Hearing for Project File 0017 at 9:03 p.m. City Planner Paschke reviewed this requested ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT as detailed in the staff report dated May 1, 2013, specific to industrial silos. Discussion included the potential types of storage that could be accommodated by these silos (e.g. liquid nitrogen, oxygen, or grain) with their intent typically to hold a product used in process, while their design could be different in size or composition; reference to the exception listed on page 2 of the report (lines 47-50); and anticipated exception of fuel storage tanks as exempt, since they would be considered more like water towers and not fit this classification. Mr. Paschke stated that, if the Commission chose to include fuel storage, he was unsure if he would allow them in any district beyond where they were currently located. Consensus of the Commission was that fuel storage tanks not be added. Member Boguszewski referenced language on page 3 (lines 71-75) with Mr. Paschke clarifying that this was intended to speak to new versus existing structures; and cited an example of an existing tenant looking to expand in that industrial area, and concern that they would need to proceed through some process. Member Cunningham questioned if other industrial silos needed to be addressed as listed on page 3 (line 92); with Mr. Paschke advising that the only structures that staff thought should be added were those they thought should be exempt upon further review, and modifying the language as suggested seemed to be the most appropriate way to do so. Under the listed exemptions in Section 2.0, Item B (lines 93-96), Member Daire questioned the process of adverse findings for adjacent properties, with Mr. Paschke advising that it would be an administrative decision of the Community Development Department; and subject to those decisions being appealable to the City Council as defined by City Code in several applications and areas. Chair Gisselquist clarified that the only modifications to this existing code language was highlighted in red in the staff report. Chair Gisselquist closed the Public Hearing at 9:12 p.m.; no one appeared for or against. MOTION Member Olsen moved, seconded by Member Gisselquist to recommend to the City Council APPROVAL of the proposed TEXT AMENDMENT so Section 1011.07 Height Exemptions in all Districts, as submitted by the Planning Division and detailed in Section 2 of the staff report dated May 1, 2013. Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 Abstentions: 1 (Daire) Motion carried.