My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_9647
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
09xxx
>
9600
>
res_9647
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:39:43 AM
Creation date
12/2/2004 10:04:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
9647
Resolution Title
Approving a conditional use permit for 2945 Partridge Road (Roseville Chrysler Plymouth) to allow a motor vehicle dealership extension
Resolution Date Passed
3/22/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly called held at the City Hall on Monday, the <br />22nd day of March, 1999, at 6:30 p.m.. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Mastel, Goedeke, Maschka, Wall <br />and the following were absent: None <br /> <br />Council Member Maschka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 9647 <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />FOR 2945 PARTRIDGE ROAD (ROSEVILLE CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH) <br />TO ALLOW A MOTOR VEHICLE DEALERSHIP EXTENSION (P.F. 3098) <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Jerry Golinvaux, Roseville Chrysler Plymouth, 2805 Highway 35W North <br />has requested approval to allow a motor vehicle dealership for the purpose of storing excess <br />vehicles, on property located at 2945 Partridge Road; <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Section 1007.03C8 states that new and used motor vehicle sales are allowed <br />by a dealer, by conditional use permit; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the site does not meet the current requirements for front, rear, and side <br />yard setbacks and encroaches into adjacent private or public property; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the site, located in Comprehensive Plan District #10 (with a Comprehensive <br />Plan designation of!) is zoned 1-2, General Industrial; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the <br />request on Wednesday, March 10, 1999, and recommended approval ofthe requested <br />conditional use permit (subject to conditions); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council received the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation on Monday, March 22, 1999; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The project will not create additional traffic nor the need for additional public facilities. <br />With proper exterior building treatment, drainage, and landscaping, the building will <br />not have an impact on surrounding property values. There appears to be no impact on <br />general health, safety, and public welfare. In addition, the project complies with the <br />Comprehensive Plan designation as an industrial use. <br /> <br />2. Section 1007.01Ala states that a building must have a 40-foot front yard setback. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.