My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0520
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0520
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2013 10:13:33 AM
Creation date
6/5/2013 10:13:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/20/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, May 20, 2013 <br /> Page 20 <br /> quirements and demonstrate they do so; with both the City and Watershed follow- <br /> ing up on those issues, ensuring that there would be no drainage off-site. <br /> Councilmember Willmus requested additional information from the developer on <br /> curb appeal and aesthetics, especially for those properties on the south and their <br /> concerns with facing the garage side of the proposed homes. <br /> Mr. Fair, as the developer, advised of their intent to landscape Outlots A and B to <br /> hide the homes, and noted the proposed location of the garages to the left or right <br /> as detailed in the Preliminary Utility Plans (sheet 2 of Attachment C) showing the <br /> house pads and existing residents seeing the sides of the homes. Mr. Fair advised <br /> that the intent was to utilize as much side yard as possible for prospective home- <br /> owners, by trying to create Outlot A and B as an amenity and transition from the <br /> new neighborhood into the old neighborhood, with significant landscaping <br /> planned. <br /> In addressing headlights, Mayor Roe noted that anytime a new street abutted an <br /> existing street, the potential existed, but advised that there was not always a reso- <br /> lution that the City could require; confirmed by Mr. Paschke that nothing was <br /> provided in City Zoning ordinance that would address that issue. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Mr. Schwartz advised that plantings <br /> in drainage easements were typically not allowed; however, there had been some <br /> past practice on a case by case basis depending on the actual site, for the City to <br /> work with a developer on a planting plan. Mr. Schwartz noted that the Outlots <br /> would provide infiltration-type drainage basins, and any plantings would be pre- <br /> ferred within those basins. <br /> In addressing Councilmember Willmus' concerns for screening headlights for <br /> homes north and south, Mr. Schwartz advised that each individual basis could be <br /> looked at; however, he noted that the concern would be that drainage not be <br /> blocked; and again would require review on a case by case basis. In response to <br /> Mayor Roe related to swales on easements or lots themselves, on the north and <br /> east sides specifically, Mr. Schwartz advised that the drainage plan would indicat- <br /> ed some plantings would be on the swales and some not; and while the swales had <br /> been required by the City, they may be wider than the drainage easement itself <br /> Discussion ensued regarding plantings for screening purposes in the City right-of- <br /> way without interrupting drainage patterns (south side of Millwood), while allow- <br /> ing for 10' of snow storage behind the curb. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe as to whether, as part of approving the Preliminary <br /> Plat, and conditions applied, screening could be required on the boulevard on the <br /> south side of the street, and therefore attached to Plat approval or if that would be <br /> outside the actual Plat itself. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.