My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0520
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0520
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2013 10:13:33 AM
Creation date
6/5/2013 10:13:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/20/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, May 20, 2013 <br /> Page 33 <br /> Ms. Bacon suggested, referencing the 2006 process, use of the profile survey <br /> (Survey Monkey) and invited people to participate, advising that it could be done <br /> again and include whomever the City Council wished and in a uniform manner; <br /> and also was more easily read and manipulated for the advertising process. <br /> Mayor Roe concurred with its uniformity, while still allowing an opportunity to <br /> volunteer additional items beyond that standard list. <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted the need for the City Council to be comfortable <br /> going forward with whatever individual was ultimately selected; and that para- <br /> mount to that, it could be helpful to bring in Commission Chairs for their perspec- <br /> tive. In his continuing review of the City Manager position, Councilmember <br /> Willmus advised that he kept coming back to the fact that this was the one em- <br /> ployee for whom the City Council was ultimately responsible. With that in mind, <br /> Councilmember Willmus questioned how valid the broad approach had been in <br /> the past, and may have resulted in fits that were not so good for the City Council, <br /> leading him to look at a smaller pool of those initially evaluation and weighing <br /> candidates. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte concurred that a smaller pool of input would be easier <br /> to manage; and suggested links for Commission Chairs could be different than <br /> other links even though there addressed the same questions, but segregated the <br /> various groups. <br /> Councilmember McGehee concurred with Councilmember Willmus as well, that <br /> this was the City Council's employee, and while a broad constituency of the <br /> community through Survey Monkey would be nice, she noted that at least 50% of <br /> the community was not on line. Councilmember McGehee opined that a smaller <br /> pool was preferable; noting that staff's input was very important as a leader was <br /> considered for staff, with everyone cognizant already of the need for civic en- <br /> gagement and the public/consumer aspect of the City and its departments. <br /> At the request for clarification by Councilmember Laliberte, Councilmember <br /> McGehee suggested staff include Department Heads. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested as a facilitator and not as an advocate for any position, that <br /> he was hearing the majority desire for the City Council and Department Heads to <br /> develop the criteria, without engaging the public for that portion. <br /> Councilmembers Willmus and McGehee concurred that this provided an accurate <br /> presentation of discussion so far. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte noted that there was a small portion of the public very <br /> engaged, involved, and vocal; however, she was not sure if they were representa- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.