Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />D. Holt reiterated that the charge of the commission is to research the topic and provide <br /> <br /> <br />information to the City Council so they can make a decision. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Responding to D. Holt, staff indicated that because of the importance Roseville Residents place <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />on their Parks and Recreation system, that at some point, the consideration of a Park Board may <br /> <br /> <br />be advantageous for Roseville. As guided by the recently updated Master Plan it is suggested <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />that Roseville consider a Park District, which is not currently allowed by State Law. A Park <br /> <br /> <br />Board seems like it could be a logical step or progression for Roseville. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The Commission thanked Wall and Simbeck for their work. More discussion will occur at the <br /> <br /> <br />May meeting. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Conclusion <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Based on the information gathered by the designated Commission members on the topic and <br /> <br /> <br />discussion at last month, the demonstrated importance and value placed on parks and <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />recreation by Roseville residents, and the guidance in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, the <br /> <br /> <br />Parks and Recreation Commission feels the Park Board structure has merit and should be <br /> <br /> <br />furthered evaluated by the City Council to ensure the parks and recreation system is managed in <br /> <br /> <br />the best interest of the City <br /> <br /> <br />DRAFT Eš© ©;Ýz;Þ ,ä t©‰­ “7 w;-©;·zš“ /š’’z­­zš“  <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />