My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0516
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0516
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2013 9:49:47 AM
Creation date
6/11/2013 9:49:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/16/2013
Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Thursday, May 16, 2013 <br /> Page 13 <br /> Mayor Roe and Councilmembers concurred that this was a reasonable approach. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte questioned if the intent was to provide this to staff in <br /> time for the Council Agenda packet or to consider as a bench handout on May <br /> 20th. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested that it would be difficult to get individual lists to staff be- <br /> tween now and Monday. <br /> Councilmember McGehee suggested setting aside Monday to come up with indi- <br /> vidual lists; based on how jammed up the agenda schedule already is. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that the agenda for May 20th already included a work session <br /> discussion, scheduled for approximately 8:00 p.m. for other discussion items; and <br /> should allow a good amount of time for this discussion related to timing and ex- <br /> pectations as well. From his personal perspective, and wanting to take time in do- <br /> ing developing collective criteria, Mayor Roe advised that he was already think- <br /> ing about the process, and had started his criteria list, and anticipated that other <br /> Councilmembers had done so as well. <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned the feasibility of having criteria lists from <br /> staff and Councilmembers as a starting point for that discussion. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte advised that she was not concerned about having this as <br /> a homework assignment between now and Monday; however, she recognized the <br /> amount staff had already had to deal with this week; and opined that this process <br /> did not need to be rushed and preferred that it be a good and serious process rather <br /> than have it be dictated by a timeline. <br /> Councilmember Etten suggested using the 2006 criteria list provided by Ms. Ba- <br /> con as the starting point for discussion; with individual Councilmembers and De- <br /> partment Heads identifying those items they liked and those they didn't' like; sub- <br /> sequently providing something unified for the group for further review and addi- <br /> tional discussion if a June 3, 2013 Special City Council meeting was scheduled. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that he had been advised by Acting City Manager Miller that <br /> the City Council Chambers were not available on June 3, 2013 for a meeting due <br /> to the rehabilitation of the audio/visual system and equipment. <br /> It that was the only reason not to meet on June 3, Councilmember Laliberte sug- <br /> gested another room be used. <br /> Mr. Miller advised that alternatives were available, with one of them being the C- <br /> TV studies as the most viable alternative at this time for recording purposes for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.