Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 03,2013 <br /> Page 13 <br /> therefore affecting the entire group. Again, Councilmember McGehee opined that <br /> it required a highly substantial staff effort to implement and fund an adequate tree <br /> preservation program city-wide. <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted that the City had a Tree Board that met annually, <br /> as part of the City's Parks & Recreation Commission; and suggested it may need <br /> to have a broader role as part of the subdivision process for review beyond park <br /> dedication for larger parcels to address those valid concerns outlined by Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon advised that his only comment was to not lose sight of the 60-day <br /> review rule, especially if the Parks & Recreation Commission needed to be in- <br /> volved in working through those issues. <br /> Mr. Paschke concurred, noting the significant number of applications fielded; as <br /> well as those permitted uses not requiring anything other than an administrative <br /> review and subsequent approval. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that staffing seemed to be the larger issue, with the City cur- <br /> rently only funding a part-time forester through the tax levy. If consideration was <br /> given to enhancing the hours of that position, Mayor Roe suggested it should per- <br /> haps be funded through developer fees instead to put resources behind the City's <br /> tree preservation ordinance. <br /> Councilmember Willmus questioned if the Tree Preservation Ordinance was in- <br /> tended for everything across the board or if there was a threshold for that review <br /> by the forester. <br /> Mr. Paschke suggested that it include everything, or any developments on a lot <br /> with trees. <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted the flexibility for tree preservation through use <br /> of public land for easements so the City didn't have to proscribe to tree preserva- <br /> tion efforts; however, she remained unconvinced that an annual meeting of the <br /> Parks & Recreation Commission's Tree board would suffice in that capacity. <br /> Councilmember Willmus clarified that he was not suggesting an annual role,but a <br /> larger role for the Tree Board. <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted that another piece coming into play included wa- <br /> ter and water reservoirs currently fielded by the Public Works, Environment, and <br /> Transportation Commission (PWETC), affected by lots with trees being removed <br /> and developed; which all came under the broader umbrella of natural resource <br /> management. While part of the Parks &Recreation Commission, Councilmember <br /> McGehee opined that that role was entirely different; and how to properly respond <br />