My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0603
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0603
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2013 11:20:28 AM
Creation date
6/11/2013 11:20:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/3/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 03,2013 <br /> Page 5 <br /> the City of Edina based on income may not seem appropriate, Mayor Roe noted <br /> that they provided comparable services to that of the City of Roseville. <br /> Interim City Manager Trudgeon agreed to the need to find peer communities, and <br /> that they probably could not be universal depending on what was being measured. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon noted that another comment often heard was why the City didn't <br /> compare with its neighboring communities; but noted that they were completely <br /> different types of communities, even while geographic location was an important <br /> component for comparison. Mr. Trudgeon suggested that more thought was <br /> needed for this complicated issue. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Ms. Antonsen advised that she could provide the <br /> larger group of cities originally considered in writing; and read it off during the <br /> meeting. Mayor Roe noted that the list included some neighboring communities <br /> to Roseville, along with others in Ramsey County. <br /> Ms. Antonsen clarified that some neighboring cities did not provide the same <br /> scope of services provided by Roseville; and when doing a study, they may gather <br /> information from those located in the same geographic area, but they were not al- <br /> ways found to be a good match and even though the information was available in- <br /> ternally, it may not be used for the study itself as a comparable for the overall <br /> analysis, but for informational purposes only. Ms. Antonsen further noted that <br /> some of the responses received may be sufficient, but the position itself found in- <br /> consistent with another city or that of Roseville, and therefore pulled out of the <br /> mix. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that these recommendations would come back to the City <br /> Council as part of their budget discussion; and suggested a separate policy discus- <br /> sion as to what the City wished for a threshold for compensation based on averag- <br /> es. <br /> Councilmember Etten sought additional information on how this study compared <br /> with the City's union employees, compared to other cities and non-union posi- <br /> tions; and comparisons within the City itself, if there were any positions obvious- <br /> ly lagging behind. <br /> Ms. Bacon responded that internal equity is a piece of compensation and how the <br /> employees are valued within an organization, admitting that there was some in- <br /> consistency, basically due to unions having successfully arbitrated their rights. <br /> As an example, Ms. Bacon advised that, if the City Council determines that all <br /> staff will get a cost of living adjustment (COLA) increase in a particular budget <br /> year, those unions could contractually go to arbitration and compare themselves <br /> with other communities that may be getting a higher percentage increase, with the <br /> mediator finding in their favor to receive that higher percentage, which the City <br /> was contractually obligated to provide, creating some inconsistency in equity with <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.