My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013_0617_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2013
>
2013_0617_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2013 1:51:40 PM
Creation date
6/13/2013 3:31:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville residents have identified a city-wide goal to be an <br />environmentally healthy community. And residents have identified <br />various community values that environmental programs such as <br />recycling should incorporate. <br />Those community values are: <br />Collection – which includes Clean and quiet; Impact on street <br />(size and weight of trucks), Easy to participate, Flexibility to <br />Comingle, More materials picked up – particularly plastics, <br />Materials are efficiently recycled (local markets, highest and <br />best use for material), Rewards for adding value, multi-family <br />dwelling recycling <br />Outreach – which includes Voluntary expansion to <br />businesses, effective Frequent education of residents – with <br />measurement, Community involvement, Annual report that <br />includes information on what happens to material, outreach to <br />low participating communities, outreach using electronic <br />communications <br />Environmental Benefits – which includes Experience with <br />Zero Waste events, reduced carbon footprint, Education and <br />Leadership on Environmentally Preferred Purchasing (EPP), <br />Local vendor-terminal and MRF locations <br />These evaluation criteria are not presented in any special order. No <br />ranking of these criteria within this RFP is intended or implied. <br />A review committee will evaluate all proposals submitted based on <br />price, how well the proposal meets RFP base specifications, how <br />well the proposal meets community values, and value added beyond <br />the base specifications. Those scores will be added to scores from the <br />reference survey to develop a score for the first round. Finalists will <br />be invited to interviews (see chart below). <br />At the interview proposers will answer any questions regarding their <br />proposal and expound on how their proposal will meet community <br />values, add value beyond the base specifications, and answer other <br />questions deemed relevant to evaluating the proposals. <br />Evaluation Criteria and Weighting <br />RFP Base SpecificationsPass/Fail <br />Reference RFP Sections 5.04, 5.23, 6.01, 6.03, 7.01, proposal forms <br />Category Weight <br />Project Capability 20% <br /> Reference RFP Sections 5 - 9 <br />How Well Proposal Meets Community 20% <br />47 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.