pf07-008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

� � �- � �.. April 4 Meeting Summary Roseville Single-Family Residential Lot Split Study MEETING ATTENDEES Advisory Group Members Mary Bakeman Dan Boerigter Jim Doherty Gary Grefenberg Jeanne Kelse�� Darrel LeBarron Barbara Martinson Vivian Ramalingam Other Glenn Cook Group/City Staff Aimee Gourlay Jamie Radel John Stark DISCUSSION OF HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT During the week between the March 28 and Apri14 meeting, staff prepared an exercise for the Advisory Group to complete that included members Yanking desired outcomes of any new single- family lot split recommendations and developing pro's and con's of various regulatory methods. Jamie Radel presented a summary of the results of the exercises at the meet. Advisory Group members ranked criteria involving a"fair" application process, ease of understanding, standards by which the City Council can make decisions, and unambiguous outcomes highly; criteria YegaYding a non-mechanical applicarion process and Council fle�bility Yanking the lowest. Mininuzing environmental impacts and allowing for diverse lot sizing ranked as unportant as well. The discussion around the second exercise—pro's and con's of various regulatory methods— genexated significant discussion during the meeting. Standard Zoning�one or more district�: The Advisory Group generally supported maintaining one zoning district or creating two or more. They felt that this type of regulation was easieY to understand. One zoning district or more than one each have a set of strengths and weaknesses. Some cominittee members felt that one zoning district easy to understand and administer, but ultimately was too infle�ble and does not reflect the "actual" development in Roseville. Two or more zoning districts would promote greater housing choice/diversity, but could strain social structures buy creating areas of "have" and "have nots." Sliding-Scale Regularion: The sliding scale regulation received the least amount of support from Advisory GYOUp membeYS. Several members cbmmented that they liked the contextuality type of regulation afforded. However, genexal sentiment was that it would be a difficult process to understand and administer and creates and ever changing set of standards. The group agreed that this rype of Yegulation could be eliininated from futuxe discussion. H�brid Regularion: Hybrid regulation combines standard zoning with the sliding scale regulation. The group did not discuss this fully but felt that it warranted further discussion. April4 Meeting Summary Page 1 of 3