My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf07-015
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2007
>
pf07-015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 10:05:38 AM
Creation date
6/14/2013 2:23:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
07-015
Planning Files - Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Survey Results <br />Single-Family Residential Lot Split Study <br />Chatsworth Court (952, 960, and 978 ParkerAvenue) ��m`��� <br />Number of Survey Sent: 58 <br />Number of Surveys Received: 18 <br />Response Rate: 31% <br />1. Did you live at your existing home when the single-family residential lot(s) at 952, 960, and 978 Parker <br />Avenue was (were) subdivided? <br />100% Yes <br />No (Did not need to complete the remainder of the survey�.) <br />2. Were you initially supportive, in opposition to, or indifferent to the subdivision of this lot? <br />11% Supportive 50% Opposed 39% Indifferent <br />� <br />■ I felt that we didn't need that many homes on approximately 2 1/2 -3 acres. I felt that 2-3 homes would have been ok. <br />■ Ill-informed, suspected more of a townhome comples type deal, not single-family homes on cul-de-sac. <br />■ Periodically homes are built or remodeled on Parker r�venue. <br />■ I met with the neighbor and his plans were upscale. Could only have a positive/effective outcome. <br />■ Because I live the other side of Shryer t1ve. <br />■ Too many large homes built on a small tract of land. <br />■ Bringing young families to the neighborhood is good. Continuing to improve the properties in Roseville will <br />contribute to growth and development fox our cit��. <br />■ Potential unpacts on wildlife and runoff (stormwater and spring snow melt). <br />■ A very lovely wooded area was totally destroyed. Estate taxes will go up as they already have. <br />■ Primary reason was inadequate plan for handling drainage/run-off due to raised grade of new development. <br />■ The lots in this area are large, and the loss of privacy, the increased noise & increased traffic was un�velcome. Those <br />lots are out of proportion to the rest of the neighborhood. <br />■ Added traffic, trees removed, construction noise. 10 houses is too much. Housing market has changed. <br />3. Have you noticed any ositive neighborhood impacts since the subdivision of this lot? <br />22% Yes 78% No <br />If �es, what? <br />■ These home/lots are so high priced, it will buoy my home value. I also expect these new homes will add a greater <br />property tax base than the current housing stock. <br />■ Two older unimproved homes on Parker at the subdivision site were removed. <br />■ Visibility for the neighborhood and visibility that Roseville can be a place to grow with your family. <br />■ Really too soon to evaluate impacts. Only one house complete. �sk again in 6 mond�s. <br />Definitely not! This development does not fit the neighborhood. <br />Ultimately may increase value of our home - but that is not clear 5�et. <br />4. Have you noticed any negative neighbothood impacts since the subdivision of this lot? <br />61 % Yes <br />39% No <br />3/22/2007 .— Draft —.. <br />1of2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.