pf07-006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

. � size. Commissioner Boerigter noted his other focus transitioning from wetland to residential; and opined that he would have a tough time supporting the project as proposed, given the neighbor comments and the mass and height of the building. Commissioner poherty noted that United had originally included twin homes, but to put the road and access to the park in place, they had compromised. Commissioner Boerigter further noted that there were access problems to the park with other sketches provided, and while not within the purview of ht Planning Commission and their consideration of land use issues, expressed concern that the applicant was now considering requesting public financing assistance for the project. Commissioner Martinson noted her indecision on the application; recognizing that the applicant was known for their beautifully maintained and well-managed properties; noted the public purpose served by the project in providing senior housing. However, Commissioner Martinson expressed concern with the large mass of the building compared to adjoining single-family homes and neighborhood characteristics; and opined that traffic impacts and increased volumes weren't well thought out. Commissioner poherty reiterated his lack of support for the project as presented. MOTION Member poherty moved, seconded by Member Bakeman to recommend APPROVAL of the PRELIMiNARY PLAT, creating one (1) lot for a senior cooperative and provision of a public road (via dedication of right-of-way) or a private road (via provision of an easement, for United Properties, in cooperation with the Frieda Schultz Family (property owner to allow the development of a multi-story 93-unit senior cooperative at 3008 and 3010 Cleveland Avenue; amended to include conditions, as conditioned in 11.0 in detail of staff report dated June 6, 2007. Commissioner Bakeman offered a friendly amendment to the motion to include the two (2) additional conditions previously referred to by staff. City Planner Paschke advised Commissioners, if they were not inclined to support all components of the proposed application, that they not support any of the applications currently before the Commission, as they were all integrated, and the Commission could consider a motion to deny all three components at one time; based on their findings for denial. Bakeman seconded — will vote in favor — this is isolated piece from rest of TL — different from rest of property; always been considered to be housing; don't care for specific senior coop there — do like public road connected with it — Commissioner poherty withdrew his motion. Member poherty moved, seconded by Member Wozniak to recommend DENIAL of the PRELIMINARY PLAT, creating one (1) lot for a senior cooperative and provision of a public road (via dedication of right-of-way) or a private road (via provision of an easement, for United Properties, in cooperation with the Frieda Schultz Family (property owner to allow the development of a multi-story 93-unit senior cooperative at 3008 and 3010 Cleveland Avenue; DENIAL of the REZONING from R-1 Single-Family