pf07-006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

� • Attachment F Z\�1`74�,��E.�� Zf�6ZI1:� r�1`ts} i.'..a.L...F�� 9�J �i i�FiP S:'''S�� '..�t �;'q ii�ll�ttiTES OF ?4� ETII�G OF' I�ZARC�� f, ��E� ROSEVILLE CITY HALL � 7:OQPR s YF2ESEi"�'T: Brodt Lenz, Jacobson, Johnson, Kamrath, Kruzel, Pederson. Risto�v. Stark AI3SENT: Willrnus (called to notify staff of absence) STAFF: Brokke, Anfang, Schultz, Boettcher, Maxey, Cash. � venson GUESTS: Alex Hall, United Properties 1. iNTRODUCTIONS/R()LL CALL/PU�3LIC C0;1�1��1I�NT No Public Comment <'. :�PPROVAL OF MI1�iU'TES — MARCH 6, 2007 MEETII�'G Commission Recommendation: Minutes of the �vlarch 6, 2007 meeting �� ere unanimously appro� ed. 1. LmTITED PROPERTIES SEIVIOR HOUSING PROPOSAL NEAR LANGTON LAKE PARK Staf-f introduced this topic and indicated that this agenda iiem v�Tas for informatioi� purposes only and a recomrnendation was not expected tonight. The staff's brief review included that: ■ United Properties is proposing a senior housing de.velopment on approximately 6 acres of land at 3010 Cleveland Avenue on the West side of Langton Lake Park near the soccer field. There were 3 plans included in the coinmission packet. Two preliminary site plans were from United Properties and the third plan is the adopted Langton Lake Park Master Plan. Current access to the existing park parking lot is through the industrial warehouse parking lot on thc south of the proposed development and existing park land. Staff also indicated that park related concerns included, but are c.e1-tainly not ]imited to: • The extreme sensitivity of any park land exchange! ■ Meeting the goals af the adopted park master plan and enstn-in� future public access to the park. • The importance of consideraticn of the. �aist;ng adopted par;: �I�aster }�lar� ■ Trail corulections to the park'? �1r. F�all of United Properties presented the details of tlleir tu�o proposals and r-elayed information from recent neighborhood meetings; ■ First proposal does not change access to the park and the development is contained within the property lines of current ownership (this plan is preferred by LTnited Properties). ■ Second proposal involves a parkland exchange and includes a ne«� road to access the existing park parking lot (will discuss further if City is interested). • A neighborhood meeting was held by United Propertie� i-or those that live on I3reriner Avenue just bordering the site and Mr. Hall stated that neighbor conunents included the dislike for access to the development and park off Brenner Ave and concerns about the iinpact a four story building might have on the homes and yards to the north of the development. Comrnission asked a number of questions related to the presented proposals. �11�e primary discussions centered on o«�nership and who would be responsible for maintenance of the road as «re11 as the importance of conside�ration of the adopted Lan�ton Lake ��7aster Plan. Conlmissioner Willmus was not able to be at the n�eeting btit shared }�is thoughts in �uriting. Chair Johnson shared read those thoughts. Commissioner Willmus comments indicated that plan #1 and #2 do not confonn to the adopted Langton Lake Park Master Plan and fail to satish� the requirements of the Roseville Comprehensive Plan. Commission Reeommendation: No fonnal recommendation. T�iscussi�n centered on the importance of the adherence to the adopted Lan�ton Lake Park Master Plan.