pf07-069 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

�� enjoyment ot�;�utumn Street that we now enjoy. This building has a ti°ery large parking lot (an estimated I 7 parking spots in a building proposed for use as a 1 � tc� 20 seat deli) an the north side of the building, and which is mor� than sufficient for any conceivable use that this proposal or future proposals could design. "rhere can be no doubt that the use of the south side presents an immediate threat to the integrity of the neighborhood. To understand why, yau have to consider the actual behavior of traftic at this intersection. It can be difticult to turn out af Autumn Street onto Lexington, especially left into the third lane of traffic, but right as well. Why would the property owners seek to make use of Autumn Street as a"take aut" window? Because a south-facing aspect to the building offers a temptingly convenient route far customers to make use of Autumn Street as a thoroughfare ta their business without need to use Lexington, or to avoid making a left-hand turn across the busy Lexington thoroughfare. Catering delivery out of the south side af the building, heading to any destinations west of Lexington--e.g., the Roseville Professional Building on Hamline near the Public Library—would naturally use Autumn Street. Many patrons using the take-out window for pickup of catered trays and boxed sandwiches would find that the route over to Roselawn, and then to Hamline, would be the path of least resistance. The potential for increased traffic, and particularly at the higher speeds driven by non-residents who do not appreciate the number of small children who have been known to play in the area, would pose an increased threat to the safety, enjoyment, and welfare of this R-1, low-density neighborhood. As long-term residents, we also appreciate how small businesses come and go. In its history, this praperty has seen life as a veterinary office, professional office, and hair salon, to name just a few. We believe the City must aiso consider the long-term impact of this rezoning. After the alteration of this property to include a take-out window, another even more intensive B-1 b- qualified business could establish themselves in this property with no further permits required by the City. Imagine, as we have, that Domino's Pizza decided to locate here, with a carryout window and a fleet of drivers, to compete with the Papa John's located in the Lexington- Larpenteur stripmall. That would be identical in nature to this business here, but would produce a mammoth amount of fast-maving traffic on the conveniently traffic-free Autumn Street. This result is unthinkable to the residents of Autumn Street—both to the sznior citizens who speak of the historic quiet of the street and the younger residents who enjoy the safety provided by the neighborhood—but it is a very real, plausible consequence of the decision that must be considered when reviewing this re-zoning and permit application. The City of Roseville long-ago foresaw the need to protect sensitive residential streets in the Lexington-Roselawn intersection. All of the businesses at this intersection are given an "LB" designation in the Comprehensive Plan. While LB admits of more than one zoning categories (including both B-1 and B-Ibj, three months ago the City's own staff, in Section 6.3 of the planning document for the review of the Bookhouse appiication (PF07-O50), emphasized the Comprehensive Plan's commitment to "fairly low traffic generating users" at this intersection. In particular, in that planning document the City's staff drew the distinction with a"convenience business that relies on drive-by traffic," and stated the staffs belief that "all of the proposed allo��ed uses" in that property "would be similar low-traffic, destination businesses...." Circumstances have not changed in the past three months since the City approved that application. There is no distinction in the city code between a"drive thru" and a take-out �