Laserfiche WebLink
-� --� <br />6. Certainly the failure of the City of Roseville to accept our request for a lot-split <br />.. and to grant the necessary variance would be not only a reversal of 20 years of <br />� consistent policy but would also create a significant financial hardship and the <br />appearance of unfair, unequal and inconsistent application. <br />7. According to the City of Roseville Analysis map 4 single family residences have <br />already been constructed on the 7 substandard lots including one residence to my <br />immediate south and one residence 2 lots to my north. In addition the City has <br />approved the lot-split and variance of a��`" lot, that lot to my immediate north. <br />The only remaining lot-split not accepted o� the 7 was 2 lots to my south where <br />apparently the owner failed to comply with any of the City requirements to <br />complete the split. <br />8. The 2 separate parcels following the split, though substandard by definition <br />would still be sufficient and desireable and consistent with the recent <br />development in this attractive part of Roseville. <br />I appreciate the Planning Commissions and the City Councils consideration of our <br />reasonable request. <br />Sincerely, <br />Curt and Kim Brown <br />1754 Alta Vista Drive <br />Roseville MN 55113 <br />