Laserfiche WebLink
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br />of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 21 �` day of November 201 1 at 6:00 <br />p.m. <br />The following Membei•s were present: Willmus; Pust; Johnson; McGehee; and Roe; <br />and none were absent. <br />Council Member Johnson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 10947 <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING MINNESOTA STATE FAIR PARK AND RIDE <br />FACILITIES AS INTERIM USES AT SEVERAL INSTITUTIONAL LOCATIONS <br />(PF07-017) <br />WHEREAS, Minnesota State Fair is a co-applicant for appi-oval of the proposed interim <br />uses with the church and school district leadership of the following nine locations: Calvary <br />Baptist Church, 2120 Lexington Avenue; Grace Church, 1310 County Road B2; Roseville Area <br />High School, 1240 County Road B2; Centennial United Methodist Chui-ch, 1524 County Road <br />C2; Nor-th Como Presbyterian Church, 965 Larpenteur Avenue; St. Michael's Lutheran Church. <br />1660 County Road B; Church of Corpus Christi, 2131 Fairview Avenue; Roseville Covenant <br />Church, 2865 Hamline Avenue; and St. Rose of Lima Catholic Church, 2048 Hamline Avenue; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing i•egarding the <br />proposed CONDITIONAL USE on November 2, 2011, voting 6-0 to i•ecommend approval of the use <br />based on the comments and findings of the staff report prepared for said public hearing; and <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council has determined that approval of the proposed <br />►tvTErtiM usE will not result in adverse impacts to the surrounding properties based on the <br />following findings: <br />a. The proposed ►NTErtiM usE will not impose additional costs on the public if it is <br />necessaiy for the public to take the property in the future, because the park and ride <br />facilities represent a temporary intensitication of the use of existing parking lots and thus <br />would not have any negative effects to the proper-ties involved that would not occur fi•om <br />the no�mal use of the parking lots over the long teim; <br />b. That the majority of public comments on the additional traffic and the <br />inconvenience of people parking on the street or in front of mailboxes also include a <br />recognition that the short-term inconvenience is tolerable because of the great value of <br />the park and ride facilities, is evidence that the INTERiM USE does not constitute an <br />excessive burden on streets, parks, or other facilities; and <br />Page 1 of 14 <br />r- -- �--- -- <br />