pf07-021 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

� � 6. Item "e". You state the Design Principals are "requirements." I contest the Design Principals provided me (which are a Draft) are a part of the Twin Lakes Master Plan as you claim or are requirements. Jamie Radel provided me the Twin Lakes Master Plan which clearly states (Category III, page 3, item 5)"The Twin Lakes Design Guidelines (1988) are the current Design Guidelines until superceded by amendments or "parcel specific" planned unit development ordinances." You only provided the Draft Design Principals around May 1 well after my submittal. You now contend the mere authorization of the Draft principles' creation by the City Council in 2001, was sufficient to make it an "official document". I doubt that is true but have addressed the checklist items you described below. With general regard to design concerns you have repeatedly asserted that the City has no current plans fo� any of the Twin Lakes Development and that you could provide me no specifics as to how my buildings should relate to conceptual buildings. Your request, as it relates to any potential incomplete items of my application, is overly broad and beyond my ability to address. I submit that the Design Principals are general in nature and any attempt to rely on any specific reference may be unsupportable and is probably inconsistent with law. 7. Checklist 1— Land Use Patterns: Being a single site development with no current surrounding development we have no other buildings to relate to. You have informed me that the City has no plans to construct Twin Lakes Parkway or Mount Ridge Road so the only viable public street is Cleveland Avenue. We have dispersed the parking area around the site, consistent with the design guideline, at considerable expense compared to a consolidated parking scheme. I do not believe the site design comes under the general heading of Land Use Patterns and I have no control beyond the boundaries of the parcel so I can not address those of surrounding or public improvements. I have, however, addressed the Land Use Patterns to the extent I am able to by submitting my Division of Land with the ROW for Twin Lakes Parkway and Mount Ridge (two public roads you claim to have no plan to build) dedicated to the City. 8. Checklist 2— Streets and Public Places. We have not been asked to provide any public improvements during our working meetings with staff. We support and encourage walkability and provided a landscape plan. We asked for guidance at the earliest meetings but were not provided any Page 3 of 5 5/23/2007