My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf07-021
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2007
>
pf07-021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 3:07:05 PM
Creation date
6/17/2013 3:07:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
07-021
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
275
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A <br />Envlrenmeltal Quaiilr Board <br />658 CEDAR STREET <br />ST. PAUL, MN 551 55 <br />PrronE: 65 I-297- I 257 <br />Fnx: 65 I -296-3698 <br />T'fr: 800-62 7-35 2 9 <br />WWW.EOB.S7qTE,MN.US <br />JuIy 6, 2007 <br />John Livingston <br />Cent ventures <br />� <br />_ 1660 Highway l OQ- south, Suite 500 <br />St. Louis Park, Mizuiesota 554I6 <br />RE: 2700 Cteveland Avenue North <br />Mr. Livingston: <br />� <br />Gregg Downing has referred your Ietter to me, and I will try to respond. T'here is limited <br />detail in your letter, but we are able to give you some observations and infarmation on <br />the usual interpretation of the state envirorunental review rules. <br />First of all, every potential Responsible Governmental Unit (R.GU) that has authority to <br />permit or approve a project can make a discretionary decision to order an EAW for any <br />project not previously reviewed if evidence known to it demonstrates that the project may <br />have a potential fox significant environmental effects. There are two exceptions to this <br />discretionary power; <br />1. If the project meets or exceeds any mandatory threshold for a required EAW (or <br />EIS} the RGU must order an EAW, and <br />2. If the project is below the applicable exemption threshold (if a.ny} for the type of <br />proj�ct in question, the RGU may not order an EAW. - <br />From the narrative of your letter, it does not appear to be your position that your <br />proposed project is likely to be so small as to be exempt from consideration for review; or <br />that as your new project, it may have already been reviewed in an EAW (as a prior <br />project, where only the ownership has changed). <br />Another issue wauld be the comparison of this project to any of the applicable scenarios <br />evaluated it2 the AUAR covering this area. Leaving aside the question of the need to <br />update the AUAR after five years have passed, if this project is consistent with the <br />development assumptions in the applicable scenario the RGU may consider that the <br />project has received environmental review._Howeyer, it is still the judgment of the RGU <br />whether this project is sufficientty similar or identical to what is analyzed in the AUAR <br />1'YtC1'c <br />innesota <br />� -z ,,,� ��. �.�,,� , „_ .� . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.