Laserfiche WebLink
d. The origar�al reason or need for the setback permi� �vas not created by the current <br />o�me��. <br />e. The exisii�g improvements alorrg with proposed impi•ovement retain a mirrirnum of <br />70% of the pervious suiface and green space of the lot. <br />I, , ��. <br />f. The proposed project creates no other setback or variance conditions. <br />iv•�e�- <br />g. The proposed project imp�•oves the aesthetics, cove�•ed storage, or the functional <br />use of the site. <br />r: <br />h. The proposed project uses the same exterior structu�°e materials and colors as the <br />principal structure and accessories. <br />; �d,. ,,�.� <br />i. The final building mass is consistent with that on contiguous properties. <br />`; ,���� <br />j. The building or driveway expansion/addition does not place more vehicles <br />adjacent to living quarter first floor bedrooms of adjacent homeowners. <br />� � ..� a._ <br />k. The drainage and roof gutters guide water away from the structure and adjacent <br />structures. � <br />'.� , . � ,1J � r <br />l. The roof is properly proportioned to and integrated with the roof of the principal <br />structure (dwelling) on the properry. <br />� : <br />Other Comments: <br />J . _._ _ - .� , � ~ <br />„ <br />i � '; <br />•� <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />