pf07-054 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

L_ J Bryan Lloyd • From: Don Munson Posted At: Thursday, September 16, 2010 9:20 AM Conversation: Minor subdivision at 3077-3091 Fairview Ave - Final Review Posted To: DRC - Final Review Subject: Minor subdivision at 3077-3091 Fairview Ave - Final Review Driveway should be removed also, it is a functional part of the garage. No other comments. From: Bryan Lloyd Posted At: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:41 PM Posted To: DRC - Final Review Conversation: Minor subdivision at 3077-3091 Fairview Ave - Final Review Subject: Minor subdivision at 3077-3091 Fairview Ave - Final Review Once again, this is the plan for PF07-054. In response to some of the initial review comments: • I think that Mr. Westlund may have removed the silt fencing. • Since the nice monument sign out front is moveable (with a skid-steer loader), he might have pulled that out of the ROW as well. • The survey document shows that the impervious coverage on the developed, northernmost parcel would be under the 30% maximum. • The southernmost garage could be allowed to remain on the property without a variance because it's already a legal, nonconforming structure (i.e., an accessory structure as a principal use). The middle garage, however, would have to be demolished within 60 days of the approval of the minor subdivision and the slab would have to be removed by July 1, 2010. • As for the 5-foot drainage/utility easements shown on the survey, I don't see any previous communication that addressed a reduction from the required 6-foot easements. My guess is that we all assumed that the 5-foot easements were consistent with the code (because why would 6-foot easements be required?); it should be easy enough for the surveyor to re-draw the lines and Mr. Westlund shouldn't really be affected, so I'll indicate that the easements should be changed to 6 feet. An encroachment agreement will be required to account for the existing garage near the southernmost property line.