My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf07-030
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2007
>
pf07-030
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 3:14:09 PM
Creation date
6/17/2013 3:37:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
07-030
Planning Files - Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
[Attachment A] This map illustrates the location of the present variance application. <br />[Site Plan] The City Code limits the amount of impervious coverage (i.e., building <br />footprints, driveways, patios, and the like) to 30% of a single-family residential property. <br />The proposed garage addition and the related driveway expansion would increase the <br />impervious surface area on the property to about 31.5%. <br />The original proposal included an even larger addition that would have encroached into <br />the required side yard setback, but through the attempt to alleviate the concerns of the <br />neighbors, the applicants have reduced the size of the addition so that it would not <br />protrude as far in front of the existing structure or encroach into the side yard setback. <br />Because the current proposal still exceeds the allowable impervious coverage, however, a <br />variance is required. In order to approve a variance request, the applicant must <br />demonstrate that he or she would be burdened with an undue hardship if held to the <br />requirements established in the City Code. Based on the materials reviewed far this <br />variance request, Planning Division staff does not believe that such a hardship exists. <br />Existing improvements on the property include a two-car, attached garage; an additional <br />garage stall and more indoor storage area can be developed without the need for a <br />variance. <br />Based on this summary of the comments and findings detailed in Section 5 of the project <br />report dates July 11, 2007, the Planning Division recommends DENIAL of the <br />Nordlings' request for a VARIANCE to the impervious coverage limits set forth in <br />§ 1004.01 A6 (Maximum Total Surface Area) of the City Code. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.