Laserfiche WebLink
-.. .-. <br />1 Much of the feedback that we have received regarding this proposed intersection <br />2 improvement has not been supportive. As a result of this as well as timing and financial <br />3 considerations, we are not recommending that we move forward with this intersection <br />4 relocation at this time. <br />5 <br />6 Traffic Conditions: <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />6.11 The City's Traffic Engineer, SRF, has reviewed the Har Mar Traffic Study. The <br />following are conditions that should be included in the PUD agreement: <br />a. The Parties hereto recognize that the City, as a part of the PUD approval process, <br />has studied the continuing safety of County Road B westerly driveway in light of <br />the improvements proposed as a part of the amended PUD request. While not <br />requiring closure of this ingress/egress as a part of the approval of the PUD <br />amendment, the parties acknowledge that the City retains the right to continue to <br />monitor the safety of this ingress/egress, and to require closure of the <br />ingress/egress in the future should the City determine, in its reasonable discretion, <br />that traffic safety considerations warrant it. <br />b. A pedestrian and bicycle access plan shall be submitted for review and approval <br />by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit. <br />c. The site plan in the northeast corner of the development (near the existing <br />Firestone auto service center) should be modified to relocate the east leg of the <br />internal intersection immediately adjacent to the County Road B/Har Mar Mall <br />Access (signalized) intersection further south. This will assist in traffic flow in <br />this area. <br />d. The site plan on the west side of the mall should be modified to update the <br />parking coniiguration in this area (i.e. 90-degree parking on the east and angled <br />parking on the west side of the drive aisle). <br />STAFF COMMENT — PLANNING DIVISION: <br />6.12 Section 1005.015 lists the permitted and conditional uses within the SC zone. Retail and <br />a Restaurant Class I- Traditional (no liquor), III - Traditional (3.2 beer and wine and <br />strong beer), and IV - Traditional (full service bar) are permitted uses. <br />6.13 Section 1006.04B defines 24 hour use, which reads: Twenty four (2=�) hour uses as <br />defined by Section 1002. 02 of this title shall be permitted uses in the S-C Shopping <br />Center District but uses within three hundred feet (300) of a residential district shall be <br />subject to the additional performance standards as indicated below. A significant change <br />in the regular hours of operation of any existing use to twenty four (24) hours located <br />within three hundred feet (300) of a residential district constitutes an expansion and <br />intensification of the use and shall require modification of the plan and improvements to <br />PF07-053_RCA_012808.doc Page 6 of 13 <br />