Laserfiche WebLink
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, May 21, 2013 <br />Page 7 <br />1 <br /> Ms. Kelsey reported that she and Mr. Trudgeon had both successfully completed their course <br />2 <br />work and received their certificates. Based on that educational experience, Ms. Kelsey advised <br />3 <br />that it was their intent to get information to the HRA at their next meeting in the form of a <br />4 <br />Request for Qualifications, as provided in the current HRA budget for community outreach for <br />5 <br />business retention; and to determine opportunities to find people and for the HRA to initiate <br />6 <br />something in the next year, with no outreach being done to-date with existing businesses in the <br />7 <br />community. <br />8 <br />9 <br />Related to that, Ms. Kelsey advised that she was interested in individual Board member <br />10 <br />availability during the daytime for outreach to those businesses; and perform the initial survey <br />11 <br />with them that would prove essential to understand the issues before those businesses and for <br />12 <br />them in the community. Ms. Kelsey advised that the culmination of that data collected would <br />13 <br />become a report for the HRA to make recommendations on programming implementation the <br />14 <br />following year. <br />15 <br />16 <br />b. Multi-family Rental Licensing <br />17 <br /> Ms. Kelsey reported that the latest draft of the multi-family rental licensing program had been <br />18 <br />presented to the City Council the previous evening for further discussion and their <br />19 <br />endorsement based on the most recent HRA discussions and recommendations for drafting an <br />20 <br />ordinance. Ms. Kelsey advised that the City Council was receptive of the program outline, but <br />21 <br />struggled similarly with the HRA in the 100% cost to property owners for initial inspections. <br />22 <br />Ms. Kelsey advised that she would meet again next week with the Minnesota Multi-family <br />23 <br />Housing Association to determine options to minimize that cost for the first year, while still <br />24 <br />meeting legal requirements to make it fair and equitable for all parties. <br />25 <br />26 <br />c. Dale Street Fire Station CDI <br />27 <br />Ms. Kelsey opined that the site looked fantastic; with the site burned and cleared; even though <br />28 <br />there were some mishaps during the controlled burn by the Fire Department with sparks <br />29 <br />traveling into the neighborhood, scorching some trees and vehicles. <br />30 <br />31 <br />Chair Maschka stated that his discussion with the Fire Chief indicated that the burn may have <br />32 <br />taken on a chimney effect due to the brick construction of the building. <br />33 <br />34 <br />Ms. Kelsey advised that the last CDI meeting is scheduled for May 28, 2013; with the first <br />35 <br />thirty minutes available for the Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation providing their <br />36 <br />input, since they had not done this type of concept since the economic downturn; and some <br />37 <br />negative situations they experienced in 2007. However, Ms. Kelsey advised that their concept <br />38 <br />for bungalow homes was a concept that be an option, even though in Roseville only four <br />39 <br />homes per acre were allowed. Ms. Kelsey advised that the actual Dale Street site would need <br />40 <br />further review for needed density to make it work, with the neighborhood supportive of twelve <br />41 <br />single-family homes, even though not feasible financially. <br />42 <br />43 <br />Ms. Kelsey advised that CDI staff would discuss the current condominium and townhome <br />44 <br />market place as well, another option desired by the neighborhood. <br />45 <br />46 <br />Ms. Kelsey noted that the process would continue to involve the neighborhood as it framed <br />47 <br />recommendations to the HRA and City Council, and use their comments as a guide to draft a <br />48 <br />Request for Proposals (RFP), with neighbors invited to attend HRA meetings to continue their <br />49 <br />participation as the RFP is drafted. <br />50 <br />51 <br />Chair Maschka noted that money would be required to get an end product that made financial <br />52 <br />sense; and expressed concern with the concepts desired to the reality available. Chair Maschka <br />53 <br />noted that the general public may not understand the full picture; and further noted that there <br />54 <br />remained a significant amount of distrust, which he hoped could be diminished or eliminated <br />55 <br />through this open and transparent process. Chair Maschka advised that the concept desired by <br /> <br />