Laserfiche WebLink
114 <br />115 <br />116 7.4 <br />117 <br />118 <br />much less traffic than many other permitted uses, and so would have a negligible <br />marginal impact on traffic. <br />Impact on parks, streets and other public facilities: Planning Division staff has <br />determined that a catering facility will not have an impact on the City's public <br />infrastructure. <br />119 7.5 Compatibility ... with contiguous properties: While not specifically discussed in the <br />� 2o application, modifications to the existing building could include service doors for food <br />�2� service delivery as well as the loading of catering vehicles, but none of these alterations <br />� 22 related to a catering use would change the site plan or circulation on this property beyond <br />� 23 those of a permitted restaurant. <br />124 7.6 Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties: The Planning <br />�z5 Division has determined that, with adequate screening, the proposed catering facility <br />� 2e would not have any more impact on contiguous property values than a permitted <br />i2� restaurant that is similarly screened. <br />� 2s 7.7 Impact on the general public health, safety, and welfare: The Planning Division <br />� 29 believes that the proposed catering facility will have no impact on the public health, <br />� so safety, and general welfare. <br />�3� 7.8 Compatility with the City's Comprehensive Plan: Because the proposed catering <br />132 facility is a conditionally permitted use in the B-1B Limited Retail District, it would be <br />133 consistent with the proposed zoning on the property and, therefore, would be compatible <br />134 with the Limited Business designation of Comprehensive Plan. <br />135 8.0 RECOMMENDATION <br />136 8.1 Pursuant to City Council Resolution 9414, adopted June 9, 1997 and based on the Public <br />137 Works Director's determination that the utilization of the existing parking areas adjacent <br />� s$ to Autumn Street would adversely affect the flow of traffic in the area, require the <br />� 39 property owner to remove these parking areas prior to reuse or redevelopment of the <br />� 4o property. <br />141 82 Based on the Planning Commission's recommendation and the comments and fmdings <br />�42 detailed in Sections 5 and 6 of this report, the Planning Division recommends approval of <br />143 the request for a REZONING of the subject property from B-1 to B-1B. <br />144 8.3 Based on the Planning Commission's recommendation and the comments and findings <br />145 detailed in Sections 5, 6, and 7 of this report, the Planning Division recommends <br />146 approval of the requested CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, subject to the following <br />�47 conditions: <br />148 <br />149 <br />150 <br />151 <br />152 <br />153 <br />a. Screening consistent with that contemplated in § 1005.01 G(Buffer Zones) of the <br />City Code shall be installed along the western property line to the Community <br />Development Director's approval; <br />b. The applicant shall provide a landscape plan for the property to ensure that the <br />plants and landscape features installed are able to achieve compliance with City <br />Code requirements pertaining to screening and traffic safety; <br />154 c. This approval shall not be construed to permit a drive-through facility, which <br />155 requires a separate Conditional Use Permit; and <br />PF07-069 RCA 011408 <br />Page 4 of 5 � � <br />