pf08-008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

.. - Draft Minutes Attachment E a. PLANNING FILE OS-008 Request by Michael Schueller, in conjunction with properry owners Catherine and Riaz Hussain, , for approval of an INTERIM USE PERMIT to allow a deli and catering facility at 1901 Lexington Avenue � Chair Bakeman opened the Public Hearing for Planning File 08-008. � Mr. Lloyd reviewed the request of Michael Schueller for an INTERIM USE PERMIT to allow a deli and catering facility in the existing building at 1901 Lexington Avenue, in accordance with Roseville City Code, 3 Section 1012.09 (Interim Uses). a Mr. Lloyd reviewed previous Planning Commission action for approval of a rezoning request for the i o property; and ultimate City Council denial of the rezoning, tabling the item and encouraging the applicant i' to withdraw that application and work with staff to devise another way of permitting the desired uses on iz the property without opening it up to other traffic-intensive uses allowed in a B-1B District in the future. i:; Mr. Lloyd noted that the City Council identified a zoning text amendment of PUD as desired applications ia for uses that they could possible support, with staff ultimately reviewing those options with the City i:, Attorney, determining that neither would be appropriate for the current purposes. Mr. Lloyd advised that i a an IUP application seemed the most appropriate way to temporarily allow the deli and catering use on the i � property until a comprehensive update of the City's Zoning Ordinance could be completed. ie Staff recommended APPROVAL of the requested INTERIM USE PERMIT, for Michael Schueller, in i 7 conjunction with property owners Catherine and Riaz Hussain, to allow a deli and catering facility at 1901 a;i Lexington Avenue, based on the comments and findings detailed in Sections 4, 5 and 6, and conditions ?' outlined in Section 7 of the Project Report dated March 5, 2008. __ Discussion included the process for renewing an Interim Use Permit, with staff advising that the applicant z:� would need to go through the Permitting process again; and rationale for staff recommending a three-year 2-i term for the Permit, with staff indicating that this was the anticipated timeframe for updating the City's z: zoning ordinance. %.� Applicant, Michael Schueller 27 Mr. Schueller concurred with staff's report; noting that it was their intent to close by 7:00 p.m. each �3 evening, with their main business during the lunch hour, in an effort to accommodate neighbors. 2? Chair Baker asked Mc Schueller if he was comfortable with the proposed three year timeframe. 3o Mr. Schueller admitted that he was somewhat uncomfortable with that timeframe, but eager to get their 3' business opereting, and confident that revisions would be made to the zoning code during that timeframe. Mr. Lloyd advised that staff had received public comment from two (2) residents along Autumn Street, �.� both in opposition to the project. Mr. Lloyd noted that one was simply opposed to the project in general, :� while the other party raised safety issues for children in the neighborhood and increased tra�c specific to �,s this project. 35 Public Comment 3 i Patrick Schmidt, 1140 Autumn Street, FAST (Foes of Autumn Street Traffic) �ri Mr. Schmidt presented written comments, dated March 5, 2008, representing FAST (Foes of Autumn 3;; Street Traffic), attached hereto and made a pait thereof. �o Carolyn Bolen, 1120 Autumn Street � Ms. Bolen expressed concem and confusion regarding a pick-up window or drive-thru, and wanted t � clanfication. ::� Chair Bakeman clarified the difference between the two, and assured Ms. Bolen that the staff a z recommendation did not indude a drive-thru. as Ms. Bolen expressed further concern regarding parking on Autumn Street, noting that she was concerned a> that vehicles would utilize adjoining neighbor driveways, and additional on-street parking would create n further safety issues. �s3 Staff clarified that streets, if not designated and posted "No Parking" were public domain; but clarified that a� the only access for this project would be on Lexington Parkway. �o Ms. Bolen also questioned the location of proposed landscaping.