Laserfiche WebLink
� � <br />FAST - FOES OF A UTUMN STREET TRAI�I�IC <br />14 January 2008 <br />City of Roseville City Council <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br />Re: Planning File 07-069 <br />Dear City Council Members, <br />I write to express the concern of many residents near to the property at 1901 Lexington Avenue, <br />and we ask for your close consideration of the proposal by Michael Schueller (in cooperation <br />with Riaz and Catherine Hussain) to rezone the property and grant a conditional use permit. <br />The property is an uncommon one. For a variety of reasons, including its past conditional use as <br />well as its location at the extremity of the Lexington-Roselawn business intersection, this <br />property sits very exposed to the residential neighborhood abutting and directly across the street <br />from it. If you do not know it, we are happy to tell you that Autumn Street is one of the most <br />wonderful streets in the city. It features a mix of original residents, professional individuals and <br />couples, and families. Indeed, there are no fewer than twenty-five children living on Autumn <br />Street. From spring to autiunn, the extremely low traffic allows the street to host nightly bike <br />rallies, ball games, street hockey, and more. The unanimous view of the residents is that we are <br />very fortunate to have what we have in Autumn Street and want no diminution of what we enjoy. <br />In this letter, I will review the consideration given to this proposal by the City's Planning <br />Commission and will present the concerns of many residents in the near vicinity of the property. <br />Summary <br />As an overview, I offer three observations. <br />➢ I commend the work of City planning staff inember Bryan Lloyd, whose investigation <br />identified a past Conditional Use Permit for the irregular parking spaces on the south side <br />of the property, and we whole-heartedly endorse the suggestion at the Planning <br />Commission meeting that the enforcement of the now-expired permit should include, not <br />on�y the removal of those patches of pavement, but a more thorough-going landscaping <br />plan that adequately separates this property from the neighboring residential zone. <br />