Laserfiche WebLink
-� .-, <br />Three quarters of Sandtown-Winchester's housing units needed either <br />rehabilitation or demolition, and 600 of them were boarded up. Only 20 per cent of the <br />single-family homes were owner occupied. Nearly half of Sandtown-Winchester's <br />residents were unemployed or underemployed half were living below the poverty line, <br />and 45 per cent were receiving public assistance, and 40 per cent had no income at all <br />(ibid.). As Live Baltimore Home Centre (2000) reports, by 1990, Sandtown had become a <br />neighbourhood challenged by virtually every urban ill: poverty, unemployment, poor <br />health, low student achievement, illiteracy, teen pregnancy, substance abuse, and almost <br />paralysing lack of hope. <br />Similar conditions existed in the other two study neighbourhoods. For example, <br />65 per cent of Harlem Park's households earn less than $20,000 a year. In East Baltimore <br />32 per cent of the housing units were vacant and need rehabilitation in 2000. One of <br />every six homeowners in East Baltimore has stopped paying property taxes, one of every <br />three households makes less than $15,000 per year, half of all adults are high school <br />dropouts, half of all households do not own a car, and 25 per cent of residents are <br />addicted to drugs or alcohol (Cohen 2001). Sandtown-Winchester and East Baltimore are <br />characterized also by up to 50 per cent male unemployment and epidemic crack cocaine <br />use. Block after block is run down, with neglected lots and overwhelming blight. <br />Similar processes were taking place in other neighbourhoods of the city. Located <br />southeast of downtown Baltimore, Butchers Hill inner-city neighbourhood declined as <br />job opportunities decreased and population and economic growth occurred in the outlying <br />suburbs (Cohen 1998). In Butchers Hill, the large homes were divided into apartments <br />and rooming houses (such partitioning of large homes into several smaller units has <br />occurred in all cities), and housing conditions in the community deteriorated. In the <br />1970s-1980s Butchers Hill became a prime site for gentri�cation, mainly because of its <br />convenient downtown location. <br />Based on 1990 census data, Cohen indicates some of the Butchers Hill's <br />challenges (ibid. pp.682-686): <br />■ 26.7 per cent of Butchers Hill's households consist of married couples, a <br />much lower percentage than found in either the city (34.2 per cent) or the <br />Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) (52.2). Only 10 per cent of the <br />neighbourhood's households consist of married families with children <br />(13.4 per cent for the city and 23.3 per cent for the MSA). <br />• 46.3 per cent of Butchers Hill's households are defined as "non-family", <br />compared with 36.6 per cent for the city and 29.5 per cent for the MSA. <br />The proportion of single-parent families is similar to that of the city. <br />• The neighbourhood has a relatively large (35 per cent) proportion of adults <br />who have not completed high school. <br />• The neighbourhood's median household income of $17,341 is only 72.1 <br />per cent of the city's median household income and only 47.4 per cent of <br />the median income of the Baltimore MSA. <br />■ A higher proportion of Butchers Hill's children under 17 are living in <br />poverty (36.3 per cent) than in the city (32.5 per cent) and in the MSA <br />(14.0 per cent). <br />� <br />