2013-06-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

DRAFT Regular City Council Meeting Monday, June 17, 2013 Page 16 1 effect. Member DeBenedet advised that the last direction provided by the 2 PWETC to staff in developing the draft RFP was to include single and dual sort; 3 with a mandate that each bidder state and demonstrate to the City where its recy- 4 cling went and what it was recycling for the end market. Member DeBenedet 5 noted that the City's goal was to increase recycling collections, but also to ensure 6 those materials were actually being recycled. As an example, Member DeBene- 7 det noted that the City of Minneapolis, when going to single sort recycling, their 8 numbers shot up; however, he noted that their numbers were significantly lower 9 than those of Roseville's as well, with current Roseville numbers indicating 80% 10 participation or more. Member DeBenedet opined hat fine - tuning was important, 11 but allowing a wider range of bidders was also important. 12 13 Regarding recycling and community values, Councilmember Willmus questioned 14 to what extent outreach had been conducted to measure those values. Coun- 15 cilmember Willmus stated that he heard repeatedly from residents their preference 16 to move to single stream and sue carts; and referenced a flyer from Eureka Recy- 17 cling supporting that community support. 18 19 Vice Chair Stenlund advised that the PWETC had researched community values 20 through performing surveys; and that the City's goal of maximizing community 21 recycling could be re- evaluated if it was determined that the single stream pro - 22 gram didn't accomplish that; and upon renewal or rebidding the contract, it could 23 return to a dual sort system. Vice Chair Stenlund opined that the important thing 24 was to attempt innovations and try to find the best way to accomplish the goals. 25 26 Mayor Roe, whether in considering recycling or refuse, opined that if more was 27 being recycled than ending up as refuse, the community would find that supporta- 28 ble. Mayor Roe opined that the question is what is realistic; and the only way to 29 know that was through reporting mandates in the recycling contract. 30 31 Vice Chair Stenlund noted that another consideration for carts versus bins is the 32 workers compensation costs for vendors in their employees lifting bins versus a 33 single sort system with a cart that was lifted through robotic means, with the fu- 34 ture probably trying to eliminate some of the human components and costs. 35 36 Councilmember Willmus asked if the PWETC had addressed why other commu- 37 nities are switching to single sort recycling. 38 39 Member DeBenedet advised that the PWETC had discussed researching that; 40 however, there was no contact with other communities; while indications were 41 that it was to increase participation rates; but not allowing for any analysis of how 42 it related to recycling rates. 43 44 Mayor Roe advised that the City had been provided some data. 45