My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf08-015
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2008
>
pf08-015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 3:20:07 PM
Creation date
6/21/2013 2:42:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
08-015
Planning Files - Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
section. In the event that the committee and contiguous property owners unanimously recommend approval of <br />said setback permit, the setback permit may be issued by the community development director. In the event <br />the setback permit is not issued by the community development director, or if the applicant does not find the <br />conditions placed on such a permit per subsection B 10 of this section acceptable, the applicant may proceed as <br />provided in section ��1014.02 of this chapter, and the original fee shall be applied to the fee as required for <br />a variance. <br />1. A"setback permit" is a reduction of the front, side or rear yard setbacks of principal and accessory <br />structures in either R-1 or R-2 districts, or to the residential driveway restrictions in subsection 703.04B of this <br />code. <br />2. The development review committee shall be appointed by the city manager and shall include the <br />community development director. For the purpose of setback permit review and recommendation, the <br />development review committee shall be advisory to the community development director. The community <br />development director (or designee) may also request review of applications from other city departments or <br />public agencies. (Current members of the development review committee include the community development <br />director, chief code enforcement officer, public works director (or designee), city manager (or designee), city <br />planner, park and recreation director (or designee), police chief (or designee), and fire marshal.) <br />3. The community development director (or designee) shall, in writing, seek comment from contiguous <br />property owners before considering a request for a setback permit. <br />4. The community development director (or designee) shall schedule an administrative hearing before the <br />development review committee, the time and place for which shall be set by the community development <br />director (or designee). The applicant and contiguous property owners shall be notified by the community <br />development director (or designee) of such time and place in writing not less than five (5) days prior to such <br />hearing. The community development director (or designee) may inform additional property owners if a <br />determination is made that such additional notification is merited. <br />5. In addition to other requirements of this section, the committee, in recommending approval of a setback <br />permit, shall find that a minimum of eight (8) of the following site conditions are present: <br />a. One car garage or less is located on the site. <br />b. The proposed project improves the design or livability of the structure. <br />c. The proposed project improves the terrain or a drainage issue. <br />d. The original reason or need for the setback permit was not created by the current owner. <br />e. The existing improvements along with proposed improvement retain a minimum of seventy percent <br />(70%) of the pervious surface and green space of the lot. <br />f. The proposed project creates no other setback or variance conditions. <br />g. The proposed project improves the aesthetics, covered storage, or the functional use of the site. <br />h. The proposed project uses the same exterior structure materials and colors as the principal structure and <br />accessories. <br />i. The final building mass is consistent with that on contiguous properties. <br />j. The building or driveway expansion/addition does not place more vehicles adjacent to living quarter first <br />floor bedrooms of adjacent homeowners. <br />k. The drainage and roof gutters guide water away from the structure and adjacent structures. <br />l. The roof is properly proportioned to and integrated with the roof of the principal structure (dwelling) on <br />the property. <br />6. A setback permit shall not reduce the principal structure side yard required setback by more than seventy <br />percent (70%) or be closer than three feet (3') to a property line. <br />7. A setback permit shall not reduce the principal structure front or rear yard required setback by more than <br />twenty percent (20%) or be closer than twenty four feet (24') to a front or rear property line. <br />8. A setback permit shall not reduce the accessory structure side or rear yard required setback by more than <br />seventy percent (70%) or be closer than three feet (3') to a property line. <br />9. A setback permit shall not reduce the setback of a driveway by more than seventy percent (70%) or allow a <br />driveway to be closer than two feet (2') to a property line. As an exception, driveways existing prior to <br />October 26, 1998, and located closer than two feet (2') to a property line may be replaced with a setback <br />� � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.