Laserfiche WebLink
2.5 4.0 BACKGROUND <br />2� 4.1 <br />27 <br />2s <br />The property, located in Planning District 12, has a Comprehensive Plan designation of <br />Low-Density Residential (LR) and a zoning classification of Single-Family Residence <br />(R-1) District. <br />z9 4.2 Applications far typical RECOn�ts�NaT►oNS only require the approval of the City Council; <br />so they do not require public hearings. In situations where more issues are involved, like the <br />si vA[t[AtvcE that would also be required in this case, the Community Development Director <br />32 may refer the application to the Planning Commission for its recommendation before the <br />33 application is brought to City Council for final action. <br />34 S.O REVIEW OF PROPOSED RECOMB[NATION <br />35 5.1 The residential parcel addressed as 2045 Loren Road comprises two legal lots of record: <br />3s Loren Acres No. 1, Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, platted in 1963. Lot 3, where the existing <br />3� residence is located, is in excess of 50,000 square feet and Lot 4, which is currently <br />ss undeveloped, is nearly 33,000 square feet. The minimum required area for a residential <br />39 lot is 11,000 square feet. <br />ao 5.2 The proposed [tECOIvtB►NAT[otv would take about 2,600 square feet from Lot 3 near the <br />41 street and add it to Lot 4, and would take about 2,400 square feet from the back of Lot 4 <br />a2 and append it to Lot 3. This exchange of land would alter the alignment of the common <br />a3 lot line, but would leave the properties essentially the same size as they were platted. <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />5� <br />5.3 The property boundary common to Lots 3 and 4 is a straight line and is nearly radial to <br />the circular end of the adjacent cul-de-sac street; this is consistent with the requirements <br />of § 1103.06 (Lot Standards) of the City Code. The proposed realignment of the common <br />lot line would make Lot 4 a somewhat more regular, rectangular parcel, but it would not <br />conform to the requirement that side property lines be perpendicular (or, in this case, <br />radial) to the adjacent street. Based on a site visit, Planning Division staff concurs with <br />the statements in the applicant's narrative (included as Attachment D) that the proposed <br />lot configuration would distribute the land area between the two properties in a more <br />reasonable and usable fashion. In order to approve the requested ttECOn�B[tvA�['loN a <br />vAR�AtvcE must also be approved. <br />5a 5.4 <br />55 <br />ss 6.0 <br />5� 6.1 <br />Aside from the noncompliant alignment of the shared property boundary, all other <br />requirements for lot area and dimensions are met in the proposed [tECO[vtsltvAT�otv. <br />REVIEW OF PROPOSED VARIANCE <br />Section 1103.06F (Side Lot Lines) of the City Code requires that side lot line to be <br />5$ perpendicular (or radial, if the lot is on a curve) to the adjacent street. Since this property <br />59 is on the circular end of Loren Road, a cul-de-sac street, the side lot lines are to be radial <br />�o to the adjacent turn-around, but the proposed configuration of the new lot line does not <br />61 meet this requirement. <br />nz 6.2 Section 1104.05 of the Code states: "Hardship: Where there are practical difficulties or <br />�3 undue hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this Code, <br />�� the City Council shall have the power, in a specific case and after notice and public <br />PF08-019 RCA 061608.doc <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />.—, <br />� <br />