Laserfiche WebLink
-�. <br />WHEREAS, Section 1004.01(A)6 (Maximum Total Surface Area) allows <br />impervious surfaces on up to 30% of the total lot area; and <br />WHEREAS, the Redishes seek to increase the impervious coverage by 154 square <br />feet to 43.25% of the lot, requiring a vAR�AtvcE of 1,345 square feet; and <br />WHEREAS, the Variance Board has concluded that "hardships" are present and <br />support can be given to deviate from the strict requirements of the Roseville City Code; <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville Variance Board, to <br />approve a 17-foot vARlatvCE to Section 1004.016 of the City Code and a 1,345-square- <br />foot vAR1ANCE to Section 1004.01(A)6 of the City Code, subject to the following <br />conditions: <br />a. The proposed addition shall be consistent in size and location with the site <br />plan included with this staff report as Attachment D and be limited to 11 <br />feet in depth from the existing building wall; <br />b. The applicant shall continue to work with Community Development staff <br />to mask the appearance of the upper level addition on the split-level home <br />through utilization of structural materials a well as landscaping; <br />The impervious coverage on the property shall not exceed 43.25% of the <br />overall lot area; <br />d. Storm water runoff shall be limited to the level consistent with 30% <br />impervious coverage; depending on the soils and slopes on the property, <br />such reduction could be accomplished by directing rain gutters toward the <br />interior of the lot, installing and maintaining a"rain garden" filtration <br />basin, or some combination of these or other measures as approved by the <br />City Engineer. Building permits shall not be issued until the City Engineer <br />has approved the storm water mitigation plans; and <br />The variance shall expire 6 months of the approval date if a building <br />permit is not issued, pursuant to § 1013.03 of the City Code. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by <br />Member Boerigter and upon vote being taken thereon, Members Boerigter and Doherty <br />voted in favor; <br />and none voted against; <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />