Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />PLANNING REPORT <br />CASE NUMBER: 1313-81 <br />� <br />Paqe 2 <br />effeCt in the neiyhborhood. Zt waulc� appear that the Newtnan's have gone <br />through substantial effcrt to creat: an architecturally pleasing design <br />integrutinq the expansion with the existing desi.gn of the residence. <br />5. The variances to the sett�ack could have been }iandled as a minor variance, <br />requirinq wr'tten approval on th> pazt of affected �:roperty owners (those <br />contiquous and across the street), but the var'ance to the larxi coverage <br />is not provided for as a minor variance procec:ure. Therefore, the <br />epplication is bcing pzocessed through the Planning Co�nissio� �nd Council. <br />In other wnrds, having received written permission of the affected property <br />o:.^:ezs for the vaziances to the rear and side yard satback requiranents, <br />the princigal issue for the Plannizxr Co^missior� is that of the variance to <br />the land area coverage r+herein a 31.5 percent coverage ?s requested <br />requ:rinq a 1.5 perceni. variance. <br />