pf09-002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1 �� t07 Ronald G. Rumpsa, 2201 Ferris Lane (Ferriswood Apartments) i08 Mr. Rumpsa concurred with the comments of Mr. Coyle, opining that density was the �09 major issue of concern; and opined that this proposed use was such a dramatic i'0 deviation, and thal it was inconsistent wifh the adjacent properties. Mr. Rumpsa asked i,1 that residenis' quality of life be enriched, not reduced. Mr. Rumpsa further addressed ii2 existing traffic volumes on County Road B between Fairview and Cleveland Avenues, i i3 and impacts with additional units in that area. � �a Allene Wiley, 2220 Midland Grove Road, #206 �i5 Ms. Wiley concurred with Mr. Rumpsa's traffic concerns; and further addressed the iiG proposed exit road from the development site onto Midland Grove Road, and negative i i 7 impacts to access abilily, in addition to emergency vehicle considerations. ��d Russ Sherer, 22Q3 Ferris Lane � t 5 Mc Sherer expressed concem related to egress from Ferriswood, when heading east of t2o Highway 36 and exiting on Cleveland and the need to cross over three (3) lanes of traffic �2i to make a left hand turn onto County Road B. 922 Dorothy Kunze, 2220 Midland Grove Road, #205 123 Ms. Kunze provided comment, opining that tax revenue should not be the only t24 consideration for the City, but also that of aesthetics; and opined that this was too iarge of i25 a building on too small of a plot of land, and that this was not what the Roseville residents t2r, have known for a considerable amount of time. 727 Eileen Stack, RN, 2220 Ferris Lane �28 Ms. Stack, as a Faith Community Nurse at the Church of Corpus Christi, noted that she �2� had clients in many area homes; and thaf based on the current economy, they were i30 continuing to live in their homes, rather than move, due to their inability [o sell their 13 � homes; and opined thal this sbould be of major concern to the City. t 32 Bob Stoika, 2220 Midland Grove Road, #106 133 Mr. Stoika concurred with concerns expressed about whether this proposal would fit in i3a with the neighborhood; opining that Midland Grove was a park-like setting; and that this � 35 project would not fit in. i3s Vijaya (SP) Pothapragada, 2250 Midland Grove Road, #105 i 37 Mr. Pothapragada addressed Section 6.1 of the stafF report, detailing treffic and daity trips i38 based on the proposed number of units; and asked that other complications be i39 considered (i.e., employee and staff parking needs; visitor parking; deliveries to the site; i4o and emergency ambulance services) and Ihose additionat traffic impacts to the iai neighborhood. �a2 Fred Christianson, 2220 Midland Grove ia3 Mr. Christianson, as a former Planner in the United States and Canada, applauded the iaa eiforts of those speakers and their eloquence. Mr. Christianson asked that the ins Commission remember that their decisions were long-term; and concurred with the ia, comments of Attomey Peter Coyle. ia� Steve Enzler, representing family, 1995 W County Road B taII Mr. Enzler read an e-mail from Frank Walton of the Roseville Historical Society, related to ta9 the hisiorical nature of his family property, identifietl on the Heritage Trail, #47, and the i5G lack of notice of the Historical Sociery of any proposed activities on this site; and future t5� notice in aaordance. Mr. Walton's comments addressed concems with mass and the 752 need to honor the green space indicative of fhis property. 753 Mr Enzler's personal comments included opining that the current proposal may more 754 accurately reflect future use of the property; that it was apparently not the intent of the 155 Comprehensive Plan to eliminate his single-family residential property. Mr. Enzler opined �5e that Mr. Mueller was atiempting to undermine code limits by use of the PUD applicalion; 757 and further opined that the building still remained massive in relationship to his property i5e and home; and that his property would experience dramatic and negative impacts to i56 sunlight, air and view; and opined that it seemed to be a reasonable daim that this could 16G damage the value of their home in addition to their quality of life.