pf09-002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

�� Association based on the curvature of the road and the realities of vehicles :;u ; traveling down the middle, their speed, lack of lighting, and pedestrians walking ��2 along the shoulder. 50:; �o:, d. Mr. Dick Taylor, 2211 Midland Grove Road #302, pointed out an address that was misidentified and indicate that he felt the building was much taller that its representation in the documents and than any surrounding buildings. He also was stated a concern over the added traffic. :;.,, e. Ms. Joyce Thielen, 2210 Midland Grove Road #203 discussed the drainage issues ��o:: incurred at Midland Grove and her concern over the projects impact on their �o:: property and felt the the Orchard would only serve to further compound the issues :,��? in the area. �� f. Mr. Steve Enzler, 1995 County Road B, stated that he felt the design and footprint :> i� of the proposed Orchard was a massive building that had not materially changed �?:� from the previous iteration. He added that while the developer has broken-up the :� ��; exterior elevations, there was still a mass of building adjacent his single family u,., home. Mr. Enzler expressed concern over the accuracy of the applicants 5�� illustrations. He continued by agreeing with the already stated traffic concerns 5� � and questioned why the project is being proposed and why it was so large. G1?.s �� 520 :;z ; uzz .,�:� ;,Y2�'« :LJ g. Mr. Merlyn Scroggins, 2237 Cleveland Avenue, indicated the he believed in the City and that there would always be negative comments on any give project before the City for approval. He added the Orchard was good for Roseville, was a quality development, and a type of necessary housing in the community. He stated that both Midland Grove and Ferriswood were developed out of certain needs and necessities, which changed the character of the City/neighborhood when the were developed. Having lived in the area for 40 years it was his opinion that traffic was not an issue even though is has been increasing. ��:� h. Mr. Vijay Pottgrugod, 2250 Midland Grove Road #105, stated his opinion that the 52; apparent rational for supporting the project was added tax base. He added he felt �2� that if the development was constructed as presented the condos he lives in would 42� become less valuable as well as other properties in the surrounding area, and �:�u stated his concern over the financial viability of the project. :,t�� i. Mr. Andy Weyer, 2025 County Road B, property owner and applicant, stated that �s2 his family owner the land on which Midland Grove was built and that it once was ��:�:3 the family farm and orchard. He indicated that the City was continuing to change �3� as it did when his father had to sell the 10 acres for Midland Grove to pay road ��°:� assessments. Mr. Weyer added that his family fully supported the project and ::s� disputed the information presented by other area residents. ;3i j. Ms. Jackie Eastman, 2250 Midland Grove Road #107, opposed the project ��:�:.� because of the loss or trees and green space in the area. She added that traffic is a �s9 concern and that the Roseville Police Department has issued numerous speeding ��:i tickets along County Road B in the general vicinity. �G^ k. Commissioner Best thanked the staff for the added information and details in the �G� report and its assistance with addressing this difficult proposal, specifically the �4� comparables and relative impact on adjacent properties. Commissioner Best :;4a added stated he felt the items the Council sought review, comment, and PF09-002 RCA 071309.doc Page 14 of 17