pf09-007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

� � i o� noted that this particular lot previously sloped toward Cohansey Circle and Iona Lane i � o and the landscaping (retaining wall system) was installed to create a tiered design, � � i preserving existing trees and incorporating additional landscaping. 117 6.$ 113 114 Other lots have included landscape features (retaining walls) that lie outside or are adjacent to the existing drainage swale. Currently there are no objects that impede drainage on the Owasso Ridge site. i�� , 6.9 The Planning Division finds that adding 10+ feet to the rear of each lot and writing in an � � � exception for the retaining wall/landscape enhancements would be in the best interest of � �� the City to correct the non-conformities and would afford current and future property � �� owners better options for including patios, decks, and/or porches, while having only 119 minimal impacts on adjacent residential properties. � 20 G.O PLANNING COMMISSION/STAFF RECOMMENDATION »� 1?7 173 124 �z� �ze 121 128 izy 13C 13"i 132 13? 134 6.1 On June 23, 2009 that Roseville Planning Commission held the duly noticed public hearing regarding the Owasso Ridge request. No citizens were in the audience to address the Commission, but Commissioners did seek clarification on the intent of the action (eliminate non-conformities and afford future allowances for patios, decks, and/or porches); staff's interpretation of the Code related to patios, decks, and porches (patios and decks under 24 inches allowed to within 2 feet of a property line, while decks over 24 inches and porches required to be setback 10 feet from property line) ; inconsistencies in the historical record (the record would indicate that permits based on surveys were issued to the developer not current home owners, including two with very minor, 12 inches or less, deck stairway/overhang encroachments. Patios were not included in permit and installed after final inspections) ; applicable setback criteria (staff believes that the current is most applicable and equitable) ; and ultimate solution of ongoing issue with proposed action (staff does not foresee further issues with site improvements if Amendment is approved. � s5 6.2 The Commission voted (7-0) to recommend approval of the subject request based on the � sc information provided in Sections 4 and 5 of the project report date June 3, 2009, subject �� _s i to the following conditions (minutes attached) : � 3e a. The Owasso Ridge Home Owner's Association shall hire a land surveyor to � 3s prepare a Preliminary Plat for review, comment, and acceptance by Ramsey � Uc County and to prepare the F�NAL PLAT for approval by the City Council. 141 b. The PUD Agreement shall be revised by the Planning Division to address the 15- � a z foot inclusion on the rear of each lot, provide specific language regarding patio, i 4� deck, and/or porch allowances, and create an exception for the landscaping and 144 retaining wall at 2766 Cohansey Circle, for review and final approval by the City � a �� Council. 146 7.0 PROJECT UPDATE i n � 7.1 Since the Planning Commission meeting of June 6, 2009, the Owasso Ridge Home �a� Owner Association (HOA) has hired E. G. Rud and Sons (surveyors) to create and i� s complete the necessary subdivision platting documents. Initially there was discussion PF09-007 RCA 092109.doc Page 4 of 5