Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />The Setback Permit process was created to lighten the load of the Planning <br />Commission/Variance board by allowing certain minor deviations from Code <br />requirements to be administratively approved. Planning Division Staff feels like this <br />process has worked well, and has identified a couple of changes to clean up some <br />conflicting language; the basic policies for the Setback Permit would not be changed. <br />The bigger change that will be proposed is the extension of the same kind administrative <br />approval to minor excesses of impervious coverage. There are occasional applications for <br />really significant excess impervious coverage, and these would continue to be treated as <br />variance conditions. But planning division staff has been working on drafting a zoning <br />ordinance amendment to treat the more minor proposals much like a Setback Permit; that <br />is, administrative approval could be granted subject to review against a series of criteria <br />and the mitigation of storm water runoff to the level that is allowed by the Code. <br />If you have general questions or comments about things we should consider as we <br />proceed, we can talk briefly about them now. Otherwise, we'll continue to work on the <br />amendment, discuss the proposed changes with the DRC, and bring back for a public <br />hearing with the variance board or planning commission for your recommendation. <br />�� � � <br />��.� ; ��.,? � <br />M� �� �, n <br />�� �a�.� �1�� <br />�l�-l�c. �e,:� ��I� <br />�'G�f(�V � <br />� <br />��.� ���.�.�.„ � �Q,.�_� <br />� � <br />�� � �'� I�c�� ��.� . <br />_�, �,�� ov�.� . ��,.���� <br />, ;� <br />���� ('���'�- w�� ���°�e����,��-� <br />