pf08-024 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

the shopping center property were to be sold in the future, Community Development staff i- recommends either requiring PHS to achieve a 10-foot setback from the south side of the '�'� property (possibly through a Recombination Minor Subdivision as part of the Final PUD ��i application) or incorporating into the PUD Agreement a requirement that, pursuant to .� selling one or both of the parcels, enough land be retained to provide a 10-foot building �� setback from the southern side property line. � 8.6 Chapter 1018 (Parking) of the City Code requires office and retail uses to provide 5 '� parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of leasable space and requires 4.1 spaces per '�� 1,000 square feet for public assembly places like the proposed training areas. The 2o wellness center, staff resource rooms and building common areas do not require any ? i parking. Given these parking requirements, the office building would have to provide ''' about 118 parking spaces — either on-site or by a shared parking agreement with the :' _� adjacent shopping center — once the addition is completed. Planning Division staff '` believes that the shared parking field between the office and shopping center will be '; adequate to accommodate the normal parking needs of both the office and shopping _�� center uses even after approximately 45 spaces are lost to the proposed office addition. � 2� 8.7 Once every month or two, PHS plans to hold company-wide trainings for as many as 200 � 2� people at this Hamline location. While employees who are normally at this office could � 2�� represent up to half of the attendees at some of these training sessions, it is possible that �:�i; 100 or more additional vehicles will arrive at the office on these occasions. Planning i:3 � Division staff recommends requiring PHS to enter into a parking agreement with �'3� Roseville Covenant Church directly across Centennial Drive to absorb the heightened '�'3�� parking demand created by the training sessions; in conversations with the applicant staff "3 = learned that PHS and the church have a good relationship and have already had positive �:�� discussions about such a parking agreement. , :3��; 9.0 i3� 9.1 13£3 139 140 141 142 143 1�4 145 PUBLIC HEARING No members of the public have contacted staff about the proposal, nor did anyone speak at the public hearing. 9.2 Prompted by some ambiguities in the proposed floor plan, the Planning Commission was interested in ensuring that healthcare services are not provided on site. Representatives from PHS verified that on site uses will be limited to administrative offices, meeting rooms, training spaces, and related activities and that all health care uses would be in properly licensed facilities not at this location. The Planning Commission recommended approving the GEtvERaL CotvCEPT PUD subject to the condition that no inedical/health care services are provided on site. �as 9.3 147 14F3 149 Planning Commissioners also expressed an interest in ensuring that the PHS office property remain on the tax rolls and recommended including such a requirement as a condition of approval. The City Attorney has advised against including such a condition of approval preserving the non-exempt status of the property. � 5� 9.4 The Planning Commission recommended approving the GEtvERA[, CoNCEPT PUD with i 5� the condition that parking agreements with the Roseville Covenant Church and Hamline � 5z Center properties be recorded to ensure that the parking requirements for the office uses 153 will continue to be met. Although a cross parking agreement between the office and �- shopping center may already exist, staff is working with PHS to determine whether an PF08-024 RCA 072808-Final Page 4 of 6 • �