My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf08-024
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2008
>
pf08-024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 1:48:46 PM
Creation date
6/24/2013 3:26:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
08-024
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
property (possibly through a Recombination Minor Subdivision as part of the Final PUD <br />application) or incorporating into the PUD Agreement a requirement that, pursuant to <br />selling one or both of the parcels, enough land be retained to provide a 10-foot building <br />setback from the southern side property line. <br />8.6 Chapter 1018 (Parking) of the City Code requires office and retail uses to provide 5 <br />parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of leasable space and requires 4.1 spaces per <br />1,000 square feet for public assembly places like the proposed training areas. The <br />wellness center, staff resource rooms and building common areas do not require any <br />parking. Given these parking requirements, the office building would have to provide <br />about 118 parking spaces — either on-site or by a shared parking agreement with the <br />adjacent shopping center — once the addition is completed. Planning Division staff <br />believes that the shared parking field between the office and shopping center will be <br />adequate to accommodate the normal parking needs of both the office and shopping <br />center uses even after approximately 45 spaces are lost to the proposed office addition. <br />8.7 Once every month or two, PHS plans to hold company-wide trainings for as many as 200 <br />people at this Hamline location. While employees who are normally at this office could <br />represent up to half of the attendees at some of these training sessions, it is possible that <br />100 or more additional vehicles will arrive at the office on these occasions. Planning <br />Division staff recommends requiring PHS to enter into a parking agreement with <br />Roseville Covenant Church directly across Centennial Drive to absorb the heightened <br />parking demand created by the training sessions; in conversations with the applicant staff <br />learned that PHS and the church have a good relationship and have already had positive <br />discussions about such a parking agreement. <br />9.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />Based on the comments and findings outlined in Sections 5-8 of this report, the Planning <br />Division recommends approval of the request for an GENERAL CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT <br />DEVELOP1�tENT to allow the proposed office expansion, subject to the following <br />conditions: <br />a. the landscape plan submitted for F1NAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT approval <br />shall include the heightened screening necessary to mitigate the visual and noise <br />effects of the service access and trash enclosure on the residential property across <br />Hamline Avenue; <br />b. a sidewalk at least 6 feet in width shall be provided between the western end of <br />the existing office building and the adjacent drive lane; <br />c. the applicant shall provide for inclusion in the final Planned Unit Development <br />Agreement a parking agreement between the office property and the shopping <br />center to ensure that the required 118 parking spaces are accommodated between <br />the two properties regardless of whether the properties are under common <br />ownership; <br />d. the applicant shall provide for inclusion in the final Planned Unit Development <br />Agreement a parking agreement with Roseville Covenant Church to ensure that <br />the additional parking demands created by periodic employee trainings is <br />accommodated without the need to utilize parking in nearby public rights-of-way; <br />and <br />PF08-024 RPCA 070208 <br />� Page 4 of 5 <br />W • <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.