pf08-017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1G9 H.O REVIEW OF PROPOSED VARIANCE � � 0 8.1 Section 1005.01 (Business Parking Setbacks) of the City Code requires parking areas to 111 be set back at least 15 feet from a property line adjacent to a street right-of-way, whereas >> 2 the proposed parking area is only 5 feet from the property line adjacent to the Alta V ista 113 Drive/Dale Street right-of-way. 114 115 116 117 ��8 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 i2$ 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 �5n 8.2 Section 1104.05 of the Code states: "Hardship: Where there are practical difficulties or undue hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this Code, the City Council shall have the power, in a specific case and after notice and public hearings, to vary any such provision in harmony with the general purpose and intent thereof and may impose such additional conditions as it considers necessary so that the public health, safety and general welfare may be secured and substantial justice done.. " 8.3 State Statute 462.357, subd. 6(2) provides authority for the ciTy to "hear requests for variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual properry zrnder consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. `Undue hardship' as used in connection with the granting of a vari�mce means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if� granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance ... The board or governing body as the case may be mcry impose conditions in the granting of variances to insure compliance and to protect ". 8.4 The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls: The applicant has experimented with different parking lot configurations that met the setback requirements, but found that parking spaces would have to be eliminated — possibly necessitating a different variance — and that the incoming traffic would be routed close enough to the building entrance to be potentially dangerous to the residents. The Planning Division has determined that the property can be put to a reasonable use under the official controls if a vaRtANCE is approved. 8.5 The pli�t of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the propertv not created by the landowner: The unique conditions on this parcel relate to the fact that the eastern property line is angled and that the property is bounded by unusually wide rights-of-way. The property was created as part of the 1876 Asylum Out Lots plat, but since staff has been unable to locate a copy of the plat in City or County files no determination can be made regarding whether this is the original shape of the property or whether additional right-of-way was dedicated over time. But even though the proposed encroachment could perhaps be eliminated by vacating some of the right-of-way, there would be no guarantee that a vacation request would ultimately be approved or that all variance conditions would be eliminated. The Planning Division has determined that the plight of the landowner is due to unique circumstances not created by the landowner. PF08-017 RCA 061608.doc Page 4 of 6 • •