My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf08-017
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2008
>
pf08-017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 9:07:02 AM
Creation date
6/24/2013 3:30:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
08-017
Planning Files - Type
Rezoning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft Resolution Attachment H <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />� Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />2 Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 16`h day of June, 2008, at 6:00 p.m. <br />3 The following members were present: ; <br />� and was absent. <br />= Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />� RESOLUTION NO. <br />� A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO §1005 (BUSINESS DISTRICTS) OF <br />� THE ROSEVILLE CITY CODE FOR FICEK INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC AT 619- <br />a 637 LARPENTEUR AVENUE (PF08-017) <br />� o WHEREAS, Ficek Investment Company, LLC is the owner of property at 619-637 <br />� � Larpenteur Avenue; and <br />�2 WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as: <br />�:� ASYLUM OUT LOTS SUBJ TO ESMTS & RDS; <br />�^ S 185 FT OF PART W OF WW R/W OF BLK 1 <br />� s PIN: 14-29-23-44-0046 <br />16 WHEREAS, Section 1005.01 (Minimum Dimensional Requirements) requires a 15-foot <br />� � setback from the right-of-way for a parking area in a B-3 Districts; and <br />�� WHEREAS, the property owner seeks to create a parking area that is 5 feet from the Dale <br />� a Street right-of-way, requiring a 10-foot variance; and <br />2o WHEREAS, The Roseville Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the <br />2� requested VARIANCE, concluded that "hardships" are present, and voted 6-0 to recommend <br />22 approval of the request based on the comments, findings, and conditions of the staff report dated <br />23 June 4, 2008; and <br />2a WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council concurs with the Planning Commission <br />zs conclusion pertaining to "hardships" and has determined that approval of the requested <br />2s VARIANCE will not compromise the public health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of <br />?� Roseville; <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />• • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.