Laserfiche WebLink
4.O REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br />4.1 Although Roseville's 2030 Comprelzensive Plurt would apply a land use designation of <br />Neighborhood Business to both of the subject parcels, that document has not yet been <br />approved by the Metropolitan Council and ratified by the City Council. This proposal, <br />therefore, must be evaluated within the context of the existing Comprehensive Plan. <br />4.2 The property at 2167 Lexington Avenue has a Comprehensive Plan designation of <br />Business (B), which allows for a wide variety of residential, retail, restaurant, office, and <br />other commercial uses corresponding even to the more intense business zoning districts; <br />the proposed business use is to be located on this parcel. The property at 1126 Sandhurst <br />Drive has a Comprehensive Plan designation of Low Density Residential (LR), which <br />corresponds to the kinds of single-family and two-family uses allowed in R-1 and R-2 <br />zoning districts, respectively. Given that the proposal only puts parking and an accessory <br />structure (for the trash container) on this parcel and that storage buildings and off-street <br />parking and loading areas are allowed in the zoning districts associated with the LR land <br />use designation of the Comprehensive Plan, no change to the Comprehensive Plan Land <br />Use Map is necessary for this proposal. <br />4.3 The Cornerstone Neighborhood Mixed-Use Project, incorporated into the Comprehensive <br />Plan in 1999 as a master plan of sorts to redesign key, under-utilized retail and <br />commercial intersections, determined that a redesigned Lexington Avenue/County Road <br />B intersection would have great potential for positive community impact. The document <br />indicates that "careful attention to the concerns of the neighborhood could make this <br />corner fulfill the wishes of its adjacent residents [and] it could become the touchstone f��r <br />establishing an appealing balance of structure, open space, design and use." <br />The Cornerstone project stresses the importance of locating at least modest buildings at <br />the corners of the intersection to "create a sense of place and closure" and expresses <br />optimism for a successful redevelopment of this intersection as a whole despite the <br />challenges presented by the lack of structures in the corners of the park and gas station <br />properties. And although Cornerstone explicitly makes no recommendation of a preferred <br />density or scale of development, it frequently advocates for a mix of office and retail uses <br />on a"ground floor" with residential or office uses "above." <br />S.O REVIEW OF ZONING/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT <br />5.1 The GENERAL CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT is a process by which a <br />development/redevelopment proposal is formally presented in a public hearing to the <br />Planning Commission for consideration. A PLANNED UN[T DEVELOPMENT (PUD) is a <br />zoning district which may include single ar mixed uses on one or more lots or parcels, <br />and is intended to be used in unique situations to create a more flexible, creative, and <br />efficient approach to the use of the land subject to the procedures, standards, and <br />regulations contained in the City Code. If the City Council ultimately approves the <br />GENERAL CONCEPT plans, the applicant then prepares fully detailed development plans <br />for final approval. <br />5.2 Because a PUD is intended to provide flexibility with respect to standard requirements <br />for physical development parameters on a property, it's useful to identify where the <br />proposed PUD district would differ from the standards of established zoning districts; the <br />following table illustrates the proposed differences: <br />PF09-003 RPCA 030409 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />i � <br />