pf09-003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment A ;::;:� consequence of reducing the parking lot, and therefore supported Mr. Paschke's suggestion for "proof of 2�:>�> parking" for future reference. 26? Commissioner poherty concurred with that concern, that if adequate parking were not available on site, 2h:s people would park on Sandhurst, creating extremely adverse outcomes. 20� Commissioner GottFried supported the parking being built as required for the building's tenants. 2�o Commissioner Martinson expressed concern regarding the traffic visibility triangle and customary speeds 2 � ^� of traffic. 2�2 Mr. Paschke noted Condition A and ongoing discussions between the applicant and staff on final 2�3 placement of the building. 2�a Commissioner Boerigter noted the competing uses at that signalized intersection and nature of the 2�;� generic safety triangle without looking at the specific location in question; and spoke in support of the 2�o proposed location, noting expressed concerns. 2�� Commissioner poherty concurred with Commissioner Boerigter. 2�r3 Mr. Paschke noted similar examples in the communiry related to encroaching on the safety triangle; noted 2 r:� that the code was created in the 1980's, and that the community had grown considerably since the 1930's 2�o and 1940's when parcels were originally platted. Mr. Paschke advised that the concerns brought forward 2B� tonight would be included in ongoing discussions and addressed prior to development and presentation of 2�32 final plans. 2�33 Commissioner Gottfried noted the need for consistency as this land use designation was initiated. 2�� Commissioner Boerigter opined that, in looking at the overall picture and listening to testimony, this land 2�:; use should provide a more positive aspect to the neighborhood in the long run, as this area was 2�� redeveloped into a business node; and opined that there should be nominal impact to the neighborhood 28 i while fitting into what the City was trying to accomplish in redevelop those nodes. 2�� Chair Bakeman, while originally sharing neighborhood concerns, opined that those concerns had now 2�:� been somewhat alleviated; and further opined that this proposed use fit with the neighborhood with 290 appropriate screening. Chair Bakeman expressed some concerns with pedestrian and bicycle traffic that 29 � staff and the applicant needed to further address; but overall, she opined that it was a pretty good project. 292 Ayes:7 293 Nays:O � � � Motion carried. • • Page 6 of 6