pf09-010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Mr. Kevin Kain — Bituminous Roadways Roseville Asphalt Plant August 11, 2010 Page 9 of 10 This project wili use AspMalt Release to prevent asphalt from adhering to metal surfaces such as truck 6eds. What is the environmental impact of the over-spray of Asphalt Release and what are the impacts if this is discharged to stormwater? Wilt vehide and equipment washing acwron site and where will that water 6e discharged7 a determination should be made as to whether these waters may be discharged to a stormwater pond or whether trucks should'x washed on concrete pads wlth a means for collection of the water and appropriate off•site management. In addition, the stormwater permit should requlre that wash water be recyded. Warm Mix Asphalt The EAW mentions that Bituminous Roadways eventually intends to change this facility from a hot mix asphalt plant to a warm mix asphait plant. There is no inditation of the timing of this tonversion. The EAW does not appear to addreu the environmental impacts of warm mix asphalt. Cumulative Potential Effects � The cumulative potential eNects analysis in ihe EAW should be revised based on the actual use of the adjacen[ buildings rather than simp�y assuming industrial use. We also request that the potential cumulative inhalation health risk estimates from B(rominous Roadways and monitored data indude the impacts on the office and warehouse workers in the buildings adjacent to the proposed pro}ec[. �" CORCIUS�OIt The EAW is deficient in that it does not provide enough information for Glatlstone, and other members of the p�blic, to evaluate whether an Environmental impact Statement should be requlred. 7he EAW makes intorrec[ assumptions about uses in the neighborhood and fails to take into accou�t sensitive uses at Gladstone's building and those at nearby commercial locations. The EAW fails to consider the environmen[al impacts of ali activities at the Bituminous Hoadways site on Glads[one's building and surrounding properties. Bituminous Roadways has not addressed background levels of noise, air and water pollution and has not considered the impatt of the proposed faciliry on tbese 6ackground levels. The proposed eituminous Roadways facilitys impa�ts on noise, odor, parttculate matter emisslons, stormwater and the cumulative effeds have �ot been adequately evaluated. The proposed standards referenced in the EAW are inadequate and do not protect the public health and the environment. Based on these deficiencies, the EAW should be revised and Gladstone and other affected paRies shauld be provided a chance for review and comment on any such revisions. ISZIW[570[tANCf-IDWVE�SIJ7CEN10•McLEA�I,VAT2102 •?ELEPHONE�703�287-580�•FAXOQ?�287�56�1 W�lV.Q3dL2!!ff4R�2CSALT9�n I wwwgladslonecamoanies.c�m ��