Laserfiche WebLink
�. <br />Mr. Kevin Kain <br />Mr. Tarik Hanafy <br />September 10, 201� <br />Page 9 <br />0 <br />���♦� <br />Moss & Barnett <br />The calculatlons atso assume 95% contral for the categories total organic compounds, totai <br />hazardous air pollutants (HAPS), and total non vofatlle organic compound (VOC)/non-HAP. <br />Each of ti�ese categorles indude chemicals that the manufacturer has identified as either not <br />condensing at filter bed operating temperatures or may not candense at fliter bed operating <br />temperatures. The calculations and any modeting and tox(cs analysis based on these <br />calculations should be revised to refled the actual control efficiendes or these ptegories. <br />Modeling <br />Gladstone`s concems wfth the modeling Involve the use of background data and t�e implications <br />of the modeling results on the AERA. The modefing is at best incomplete. It does not consider <br />all the relevant pollutants and background conditions. Additionally, and crftically for the location <br />of the proposed plant, it fails to consider features of the Giadstone building and the complete <br />and detafled consideratlon of the other uses and improvements in tfie immediate area. <br />Additional work is required before the modeling can be relied on for the MPCA to issue the air <br />permit or for the project to proceed. <br />Non-criteria Pollutant Emissions <br />The modeling uses MPCA defaults for badcground concentrations and assumes that background <br />data should account for emissions for non-criteria pollutants because emissions from petroleum <br />handling and combustion are ubiquitous. These assumptions provide the basls for the risk <br />catculations in the AERA. Emissions from the nearby facllitfes, in particular the Magellan PipeNne <br />(a major VOC source) and the Valero tank farms (a state regulated air emission source}, should <br />be added to assumed background levels. In addition, the modeling and the AERA sfiould <br />account for emissions from other nearby combusGon sources, exfsting traffic emtssions on local <br />streets and interstate 35W and Trunk Highway 3b, and emfss)ons from increased trafflc due to <br />the proposed project. <br />l�i�e table below lists several non-criteria poilutar� emitted by the proposed Bituminous <br />Roadways project and indicates (f they are also expected to be emitted from natural gas <br />combustion, petrochemica) storage, gasoline engir�e operatlan or dlesel engine operation. As <br />the table shows, there is considerable overlap. <br />Non- Criteria Pollutant <br />Emissfons from Bituminous Natural Gas Petrochemical Gasollne Diesel <br />CAS Roadways Plant Combustion Storage Engine En ine <br />91-57-6 2•Methylnaphthalene X <br />83-32-9 Acena hthene X X <br />208-96-8 Acenaphthylene X X <br />534-15-6 Acetaldehyde X X X <br />67-64-1 Acetone X <br />107-OZ-8 Acrolien X X <br />120-12-7 Anthracene X X <br />�..- <br />� <br />� <br />