My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf09-010
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2009
>
pf09-010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 3:32:19 PM
Creation date
6/24/2013 3:41:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
09-010
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
651
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
—� —� <br />6.O REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA <br />6.1 Section 1013.01 (Conditional Uses) of the City Code requires the Planning Commission <br />and City Council to consider the following criteria when reviewing a coND�T�oNAL usE <br />application: <br />a. Impact on traffic; <br />b. Impact on parks, streets, and other public facilities; <br />c. Compatibility of the site plan, internal traffic circulation, landscaping, and <br />structures with contiguous properties; <br />d. Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties; <br />e. Impact on the general public health, safety, and welfare; and <br />f. Compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br />6.2 Impact on traffic: The 7`h edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers manual <br />indicates that land uses like light-industrial parks and laboratories, manufacturing, <br />warehousing, and "heavy industry" (all permitted uses in the I-2 District) generate an <br />average about 43 vehicle trips per acre of land area on the average day, whereas the <br />proposed outdoor storage would only generate up to 8.6 trips per acre per day. For <br />additional reference, a trucking terminal — another conditionally-permitted use in the I-2 <br />District — generates an average of 82 trips per acre on a given day. Even considering <br />traffic from the proposed outdoor storage and the asphalt plant, the site would only <br />generate up to 18 trips per acre on its heaviest days. The Planning Division has thus <br />determined that the proposed use would not have any greater impact on traffic than other <br />allowed uses. <br />6.3 Impact on parks, streets and other public facilities: Water and sewer infrastructure <br />should see relatively minor impacts since the outdoor storage use would rely on water <br />primarily as a periodic dust palliative, and the facility as a whole will have to meet all of <br />the pertinent erosion control, pollution prevention, and storm water management <br />requirements of the City and other Federal, State, or regional regulatory agencies in order <br />to receive the required building and operating permits. There are no parks in the vicinity <br />of the subject property and the truck traffic will generally utilize highways as much as <br />possible when approaching and leaving the site. Public Works staff is currently assessing <br />the adequacy of the surrounding roadway infrastructure in light of the anticipated weight <br />of trucks delivering the aggregate materials. <br />6.4 Compatibility ... with contiguous properties: The proposed outdoor storage will <br />produce stockpiles of materials, traffic, and noise that cannot help but be noticed from the <br />contiguous properties, but this property and much of what surrounds it is described by <br />§ 1007.03 (General Industrial Districts) as being "designed primarily for [uses] whose <br />external physical effects will be felt by surrounding districts." Reduction of entrances to <br />the site from 5 accesses to 3, adequate internal circulation, paved operational areas, and <br />perimeter landscaping and screening consistent with the zoning requirements, will all <br />help to reduce the inevitable impacts to contiguous properties. <br />6.5 Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties: When a property is <br />�, assigned Zoning and Comprehensive Plan land use designations, careful consideration is <br />given to protecting the value of surrounding properties. In light of this, and because the <br />proposed outdoor storage is among the uses that are allowed (conditionally or otherwise) <br />PF09-010 RPCA 050609.doc <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.