pf09-032 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

A#4: I indicated that there w'�s not any intention to enclose t•equipment with a fence and that the pole and cabinet would utilize as much of the natural ground space as possible. It was not the intention to build a fenced yard and fill it in with gravel. I did state that if the commission was to require some screening or replacement of shrubs that this should be included as part of the conditional use permit. (I recommend that perhaps we require a$5,000 payment for replacing trees and adding shrubs as part of the CUP). I also noted that the ground simulation provided was only to depict the width of the cabinet relative (3') to the width of the pole (4') and the distance between nthe two objects. The phot was not to depict the surrounding ground area. Q#5: It was commented that there are higher places in the park and perhaps using the hill to the south would reduce the size of the pole. A#5: There wasn't much comment on this other than explaining that the intent was to remain as close to the pathway as possible to minimize disruptions in extending power to the site. (Note that moving to a higher elevation in the park only reduces the pole length less than 20' however the ground elevation would be the same. So the visual height of the pole above the tree line would be identical). Terre Heiser Network Manager Metro-INET Roseville network.mana�er@metro-inet.us 651-792-7092 Confidentiality Statement: The documents accompanying this transmission contain confidential information that is legally privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the individuals or entities listed above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents.